nslu2: we can't use RAID instead load all modules
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
debian-installer (Debian) |
New
|
Unknown
|
|||
debian-installer (Ubuntu) |
Won't Fix
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Binary package hint: debian-installer
Hi,
I upslug2 the jaunty final firmware to my slug. I have attached two usb keys plug on it.
When installer appears, I select expert mode, and load modules:
- partman-md
- partman-auto-raid
- mdcfg
- storage-core-...
I configure the partititon scheme as:
SCSI1 (0,0,0) (sda) - 16.2 GB TDKMedia Trans-It Drive ↑ │
│ > #1 primary 10.0 GB K raid ▒ │
│ > #2 primary 1.0 GB K raid ▒ │
│ > #3 primary 4.0 GB K raid ▒ │
│ > #4 primary 1.2 GB f ext3 / ▒ │
│ SCSI2 (0,0,0) (sdb) - 16.2 GB TDKMedia Trans-It Drive ▒ │
│ > #1 primary 10.0 GB K raid ▮ │
│ > #2 primary 1.0 GB K raid ▒ │
│ > #3 primary 4.0 GB K raid ▒ │
│ > #4 primary 1.2 GB K raid ↓
but when I choose "Configure RAID", then it appears the error:
"Multidisk (MD) not available"
│ The current kernel doesn't seem to support multidisk devices. This │
│ should be solved by loading the needed modules.
No more RAID modules are present to load. So I think it's a bug. I can't pass to this step because I want RAID in my slug.
Regards,
Xan.
PS: I put some output.
lspci
00:01.0 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB (rev 43)
00:01.1 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB (rev 43)
00:01.2 USB Controller: NEC Corporation USB 2.0 (rev 04)
uname -a
Linux caixa 2.6.28-11-ixp4xx #42-Ubuntu Fri Apr 17 03:14:34 UTC 2009 armv5tel unknown
# report-hw
umame -a: Linux caixa 2.6.28-11-ixp4xx #42-Ubuntu Fri Apr 17 03:14:34 UTC 2009 armv5tel unknown
lspci -knn: 00:01.0 USB Controller [0c03]: NEC Corporation USB [1033:0035] (rev 43)
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ohci_hcd
lspci -knn: 00:01.1 USB Controller [0c03]: NEC Corporation USB [1033:0035] (rev 43)
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ohci_hcd
lspci -knn: 00:01.2 USB Controller [0c03]: NEC Corporation USB 2.0 [1033:00e0] (rev 04)
lspci -knn: Kernel driver in use: ehci_hcd
lsmod: Module Size Used by
df: Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
df: tmpfs 15036 124 14912 1% /dev
free: total used free shared buffers
free: Mem: 30076 25220 4856 0 0
free: Swap: 0 0 0
free: Total: 30076 25220 4856
dmraid -s: no block devices found
dmraid -r: no block devices found
dmsetup table: /proc/misc: No entry for device-mapper found
dmsetup table: Is device-mapper driver missing from kernel?
dmsetup table: Failure to communicate with kernel device-mapper driver.
dmsetup table: /proc/misc: No entry for device-mapper found
dmsetup table: Is device-mapper driver missing from kernel?
dmsetup table: Failure to communicate with kernel device-mapper driver.
dmsetup table: Incompatible libdevmapper 1.02.27 (2008-06-
dmsetup table: Command failed
/proc/cmdline: console=
/proc/cpuinfo: Processor : XScale-IXP42x Family rev 1 (v5l)
/proc/cpuinfo: BogoMIPS : 266.24
/proc/cpuinfo: Features : swp half thumb fastmult edsp
/proc/cpuinfo: CPU implementer : 0x69
/proc/cpuinfo: CPU architecture: 5TE
/proc/cpuinfo: CPU variant : 0x0
/proc/cpuinfo: CPU part : 0x41f
/proc/cpuinfo: CPU revision : 1
/proc/cpuinfo:
/proc/cpuinfo: Hardware : Linksys NSLU2
/proc/cpuinfo: Revision : 0000
/proc/cpuinfo: Serial : 0000000000000000
/proc/ioports: 00000000-0000ffff : PCI I/O Space
/proc/iomem: 00000000-01ffffff : System RAM
/proc/iomem: 00023000-00244fff : Kernel text
/proc/iomem: 00246000-0027285f : Kernel data
/proc/iomem: 48000000-4bffffff : PCI Memory Space
/proc/iomem: 48000000-48000fff : 0000:00:01.0
/proc/iomem: 48000000-48000fff : ohci_hcd
/proc/iomem: 48001000-48001fff : 0000:00:01.1
/proc/iomem: 48001000-48001fff : ohci_hcd
/proc/iomem: 48002000-480020ff : 0000:00:01.2
/proc/iomem: 48002000-480020ff : ehci_hcd
/proc/iomem: 50000000-50ffffff : IXP4XX-Flash.0
/proc/iomem: 50000000-50ffffff : IXP4XXFlash
/proc/iomem: 60000000-60003fff : IXP4xx Queue Manager
/proc/iomem: c8000000-c8000fff : serial8250.0
/proc/iomem: c8000000-c800001f : serial
/proc/iomem: c8001000-c8001fff : serial8250.0
/proc/iomem: c8001000-c800101f : serial
/proc/iomem: c8007000-c8007fff : NPE-B
/proc/iomem: c8008000-c8008fff : NPE-C
/proc/iomem: c8009000-c8009fff : eth0
/proc/iomem: c800b000-c800bfff : pxa25x-udc
/proc/interrupts: CPU0
/proc/interrupts: 3: 13250 IXP4xx IXP4xx Queue Manager
/proc/interrupts: 5: 88362 IXP4xx timer1
/proc/interrupts: 11: 0 IXP4xx ixp4xx-beeper
/proc/interrupts: 15: 1147 IXP4xx serial
/proc/interrupts: 22: 0 IXP4xx NSLU2 power button
/proc/interrupts: 26: 24478 IXP4xx ehci_hcd:usb1
/proc/interrupts: 27: 0 IXP4xx ohci_hcd:usb3
/proc/interrupts: 28: 0 IXP4xx ohci_hcd:usb2
/proc/interrupts: 29: 0 IXP4xx NSLU2 reset button
/proc/interrupts: Err: 0
/proc/meminfo: MemTotal: 30076 kB
/proc/meminfo: MemFree: 4832 kB
/proc/meminfo: Buffers: 0 kB
/proc/meminfo: Cached: 17908 kB
/proc/meminfo: SwapCached: 0 kB
/proc/meminfo: Active: 3124 kB
/proc/meminfo: Inactive: 496 kB
/proc/meminfo: Active(anon): 3092 kB
/proc/meminfo: Inactive(anon): 492 kB
/proc/meminfo: Active(file): 32 kB
/proc/meminfo: Inactive(file): 4 kB
/proc/meminfo: Unevictable: 17748 kB
/proc/meminfo: Mlocked: 0 kB
/proc/meminfo: SwapTotal: 0 kB
/proc/meminfo: SwapFree: 0 kB
/proc/meminfo: Dirty: 0 kB
/proc/meminfo: Writeback: 0 kB
/proc/meminfo: AnonPages: 3492 kB
/proc/meminfo: Mapped: 3112 kB
/proc/meminfo: Slab: 2716 kB
/proc/meminfo: SReclaimable: 1012 kB
/proc/meminfo: SUnreclaim: 1704 kB
/proc/meminfo: PageTables: 292 kB
/proc/meminfo: NFS_Unstable: 0 kB
/proc/meminfo: Bounce: 0 kB
/proc/meminfo: WritebackTmp: 0 kB
/proc/meminfo: CommitLimit: 15036 kB
/proc/meminfo: Committed_AS: 8376 kB
/proc/meminfo: VmallocTotal: 991232 kB
/proc/meminfo: VmallocUsed: 16432 kB
/proc/meminfo: VmallocChunk: 966652 kB
/proc/bus/
/proc/bus/
/proc/bus/
/proc/bus/
/proc/bus/
/proc/bus/
/proc/bus/
/proc/bus/
/proc/bus/
~ #
tags: | added: arm nslu2 |
tags: |
added: armel removed: arm |
Changed in debian-installer (Debian): | |
status: | Unknown → New |
Perhaps this [http:// bugs.debian. org/cgi- bin/bugreport. cgi?bug= 524342] is the same bug in debian. Anyone with technical skills could see that? If it's perhaps we should marks this bug as depended from that.
Thanks a lot,
Xan.