Comment 75 for bug 1061069

Revision history for this message
In , Johannes Meixner (jsmeix) wrote :

FYI:

CUPS 2.0.0 with upstream support for systemd socket activation
(cf. bug#857372) does not yet "just work", see for example
https://www.cups.org/str.php?L4497

Furthermore there is the open issue how the systemd unit files
should be named, see the "systemd unit files and service names"
mail thread on the CUPS developer list <email address hidden>
http://cups.org/pipermail/cups-devel/2014-October/thread.html
in particular
http://cups.org/pipermail/cups-devel/2014-October/015368.html
http://cups.org/pipermail/cups-devel/2014-October/015369.html
http://cups.org/pipermail/cups-devel/2014-October/015372.html