| 2006-09-16 12:22:16 |
Sebastian Heinlein |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
| 2006-09-16 12:23:09 |
Sebastian Heinlein |
bug |
|
|
assigned to control-center (upstream) |
| 2006-09-16 12:44:54 |
Sebastian Heinlein |
bug |
|
|
added attachment 'consistent-close.patch' (Fixes the button) |
| 2006-09-16 12:55:27 |
Sebastien Bacher |
control-center: status |
Unconfirmed |
Confirmed |
|
| 2006-09-16 12:55:27 |
Sebastien Bacher |
control-center: importance |
Untriaged |
Wishlist |
|
| 2006-09-16 12:55:27 |
Sebastien Bacher |
control-center: statusexplanation |
|
How you can see from the upstream bug you pointed that's an upstream decision and dobey argue that Novel did usuability tests that pointed that as an useful change |
|
| 2006-09-16 12:55:27 |
Sebastien Bacher |
control-center: assignee |
|
desktop-bugs |
|
| 2006-09-17 07:42:04 |
Bug Watch Updater |
control-center: status |
Unknown |
Rejected |
|
| 2007-06-13 19:10:40 |
Henrik Nilsen Omma |
control-center: status |
Confirmed |
Rejected |
|
| 2007-06-13 19:10:40 |
Henrik Nilsen Omma |
control-center: statusexplanation |
How you can see from the upstream bug you pointed that's an upstream decision and dobey argue that Novel did usuability tests that pointed that as an useful change |
It is of course debatable whether 'Close' or 'Finish' is better in this case, but as it is a minor issue we would rather not carry a delta with upstream over it. If you feel strongly about it, please lobby upstream. Thanks. |
|
| 2010-09-16 14:25:46 |
Bug Watch Updater |
gnome-control-center: importance |
Unknown |
Low |
|
