On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 23:04 +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> On an SRU: I confess I haven't looked through all the duplicates. What's
> the real impact of this, beyond some crash reports? Does console-kit-
> daemon manage to respawn relatively cleanly, or does it need some kind
> of manual recovery?
Yeah, I'm not sure. Most reports have just been "apport popped up and
asked me to report this," so it doesn't seem like it has caused too many
problems. I would wager that this has been the cause of most consolekit
crashes in the last couple of releases though, and it may be worth
fixing it regardless.
> Regardless, this should stew for a bit in Intrepid before we consider it
> for Hardy. James, if you feel it should go to Hardy and want to ensure
> it stays on a list, nominate it for that release.
On Mon, 2008-09-15 at 23:04 +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> On an SRU: I confess I haven't looked through all the duplicates. What's
> the real impact of this, beyond some crash reports? Does console-kit-
> daemon manage to respawn relatively cleanly, or does it need some kind
> of manual recovery?
Yeah, I'm not sure. Most reports have just been "apport popped up and
asked me to report this," so it doesn't seem like it has caused too many
problems. I would wager that this has been the cause of most consolekit
crashes in the last couple of releases though, and it may be worth
fixing it regardless.
> Regardless, this should stew for a bit in Intrepid before we consider it
> for Hardy. James, if you feel it should go to Hardy and want to ensure
> it stays on a list, nominate it for that release.
I'll keep it on my list for now.
Thanks,
James