To sum up things, a user with a perfectly working system may ask Computer Janitor to do some cleanup. Then Computer Janitor will suggest to remove some packages. If the user decides to follow this advice, Computer Janitor will then warn him : "Hey ! Don't play fool you may break everything"
It's unfair that Computer Janitor gives non-reliable advices and ask user to assume all responsibility.
I don't think that replacing a warning (« This may break your system, if you need them. ») by another (« Removing packages that are still needed can cause errors. ») can be called a bugfix
I'm perplexed by this bug.
To sum up things, a user with a perfectly working system may ask Computer Janitor to do some cleanup. Then Computer Janitor will suggest to remove some packages. If the user decides to follow this advice, Computer Janitor will then warn him : "Hey ! Don't play fool you may break everything"
It's unfair that Computer Janitor gives non-reliable advices and ask user to assume all responsibility.
I don't think that replacing a warning (« This may break your system, if you need them. ») by another (« Removing packages that are still needed can cause errors. ») can be called a bugfix
Computer Janitor should be secured or removed