[12.04 only] Allow Mesa 9.0.x point releases to have unredirection enabled also on intel and nouveau
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
compiz (Ubuntu) |
Invalid
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
Precise |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
Timo Jyrinki |
Bug Description
This only affects 12.04(.2) (precise). It's continuation of bug #1063690, so mostly the same SRU information applies:
[Impact]
Lower than optimal fullscreen applications performance, especially games, on intel and nouveau.
[Test Case]
Benchmark a game with for example phoronix-test-suite / pts/openarena-1.5.0 - the default settings after this bug fix should give equal performance to what previously required manually enabling the compiz unredirect fullscreen windows option.
[Regression Potential]
The feature has been tested for the last few months, and all known regressions have been fixed. The potential regressions lie in for example exiting a fullscreen application.
This setting is already the default in Ubuntu 12.10 - the stack that 12.04.2 is now identical to. It's also already default on 12.04.2 on radeon, fglrx and nvidia.
---
We currently have the following blacklist string regarding unredirection on 12.04: (nouveau|
We now have Mesa 9.0 point releases in precise, so the strings compared for blacklisting would differ now even from x-updates PPA. As an example:
up-to-date 12.04.2:
OpenGL vendor string: Intel Open Source Technology Center
OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI Intel(R) 965GM
OpenGL version string: 2.1 Mesa 9.0.3
OpenGL shading language version string: 1.20
original 12.04 stack + x-updates:
OpenGL vendor string: Intel Open Source Technology Center
OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI Intel(R) 965GM x86/MMX/SSE2
OpenGL version string: 2.1 Mesa 9.0
OpenGL shading language version string: 1.20
It'd be wanted that Mesa 9.0.x would not be blacklisted anymore on Intel and Nouveau, but original 9.0 (and 8.0*) could remain blacklisted.
Related branches
- Didier Roche-Tolomelli: Approve
-
Diff: 475 lines (+254/-111)12 files modifieddebian/changelog (+75/-0)
debian/compiz-plugins.install.armel (+11/-0)
debian/patches/blacklist_precise_mesa80_intel_nouveau.patch (+43/-0)
debian/patches/compiz-package-gles2.patch (+10/-9)
debian/patches/fix_1095001.patch (+86/-0)
debian/patches/force_unredirect_enabling.patch (+22/-0)
debian/patches/revert_fix_933776_955035.patch (+0/-65)
debian/patches/revert_fix_994841.patch (+0/-33)
debian/patches/series (+3/-2)
debian/patches/series.armel (+1/-0)
debian/patches/workaround_broken_drivers.patch (+2/-1)
debian/watch (+1/-1)
Changed in compiz (Ubuntu): | |
assignee: | nobody → Timo Jyrinki (timo-jyrinki) |
Changed in compiz (Ubuntu): | |
milestone: | none → precise-updates |
description: | updated |
description: | updated |
description: | updated |
summary: |
[12.04 only] Allow Mesa 9.0.x point releases to have unredirection + enabled also on intel and nouveau |
Changed in compiz (Ubuntu Precise): | |
assignee: | nobody → Timo Jyrinki (timo-jyrinki) |
status: | New → Fix Committed |
Changed in compiz (Ubuntu): | |
status: | New → Invalid |
assignee: | Timo Jyrinki (timo-jyrinki) → nobody |
Changed in compiz (Ubuntu Precise): | |
status: | Fix Committed → In Progress |
Hello Timo, or anyone else affected,
Accepted compiz into precise-proposed. The package will build now and be available at http:// launchpad. net/ubuntu/ +source/ compiz/ 1:0.9.7. 12-0ubuntu2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.
Please help us by testing this new package. See https:/ /wiki.ubuntu. com/Testing/ EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.
If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification- failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision.
Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https:/ /wiki.ubuntu. com/QATeam/ PerformingSRUVe rification . Thank you in advance!