On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Gustavo Niemeyer<email address hidden> wrote:
> Then whoever is maintaining the service will see that *someone* has a
> hardy-i386 machine. I don't really think that the fact that disclosing
> that this someone is running version A or B of the given image is that
> much different.
I don't see where "hardy-i386" should bother anyone too much.
That information is usually included in HTTP_USER_AGENT, which is
transmitted in most any browser request. Your hardy box will transmit
this information to any server you request information from.
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 12:50 PM, Gustavo Niemeyer<email address hidden> wrote:
> Then whoever is maintaining the service will see that *someone* has a
> hardy-i386 machine. I don't really think that the fact that disclosing
> that this someone is running version A or B of the given image is that
> much different.
I don't see where "hardy-i386" should bother anyone too much.
That information is usually included in HTTP_USER_AGENT, which is
transmitted in most any browser request. Your hardy box will transmit
this information to any server you request information from.
* Firefox:
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.0.5) Gecko/2008121621
Ubuntu/8.04 (hardy) Firefox/3.0.5
* Curl: linux-gnulp) libcurl/7.18.0 OpenSSL/0.9.8g
curl/7.18.0 (i686-pc-
zlib/1.2.3.3 libidn/1.1
* Wget
Wget/1.10.2
That said, Soren's suggestion of something even more generic such as
"current" works for me too...
:-Dustin