| 2015-02-24 16:00:20 |
Jamie Strandboge |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
| 2015-02-24 16:01:01 |
Jamie Strandboge |
click-apparmor (Ubuntu): status |
New |
In Progress |
|
| 2015-02-24 16:01:12 |
Jamie Strandboge |
click-apparmor (Ubuntu): importance |
Undecided |
High |
|
| 2015-02-24 16:01:15 |
Jamie Strandboge |
click-apparmor (Ubuntu): assignee |
|
Jamie Strandboge (jdstrand) |
|
| 2015-02-24 16:02:47 |
Jamie Strandboge |
branch linked |
|
lp:~jdstrand/click-apparmor/click-apparmor.hw-access |
|
| 2015-02-25 22:42:58 |
Jamie Strandboge |
description |
In order to support hardware access as described in this thread:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/snappy-devel/2015-January/000134.html
we need a mechanism to extend the security json. Last cycle, we implemented overrides using a .override file. For additional accesses we will do something similar, but with a .additional file.
The branch to implement this adds many tests and maintains 100% test coverage (python coverage). autopkgtests are also added and all pass. TODO: click-apparmor test plan. |
In order to support hardware access as described in this thread:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/snappy-devel/2015-January/000134.html
we need a mechanism to extend the security json. Last cycle, we implemented overrides using a .override file. For additional accesses we will do something similar, but with a .additional file.
The branch to implement this adds many tests and maintains 100% test coverage (python coverage). autopkgtests are also added and all pass.
Testing:
- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/ClickAppArmor: TODO
- internal testsuite: PASS
- autopkgtest: TODO
- manual testing on snappy to verify it implements the feature |
|
| 2015-02-25 22:45:34 |
Jamie Strandboge |
description |
In order to support hardware access as described in this thread:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/snappy-devel/2015-January/000134.html
we need a mechanism to extend the security json. Last cycle, we implemented overrides using a .override file. For additional accesses we will do something similar, but with a .additional file.
The branch to implement this adds many tests and maintains 100% test coverage (python coverage). autopkgtests are also added and all pass.
Testing:
- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/ClickAppArmor: TODO
- internal testsuite: PASS
- autopkgtest: TODO
- manual testing on snappy to verify it implements the feature |
In order to support hardware access as described in this thread:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/snappy-devel/2015-January/000134.html
we need a mechanism to extend the security json. Last cycle, we implemented overrides using a .override file. For additional accesses we will do something similar, but with a .additional file.
The branch to implement this adds many tests and maintains 100% test coverage (python coverage). autopkgtests are also added and all pass.
Testing:
- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/ClickAppArmor: INPROGRESS
- internal testsuite: PASS
- autopkgtest: PASS
- manual testing on snappy to verify it implements the feature: PASS |
|
| 2015-02-25 22:51:42 |
Jamie Strandboge |
description |
In order to support hardware access as described in this thread:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/snappy-devel/2015-January/000134.html
we need a mechanism to extend the security json. Last cycle, we implemented overrides using a .override file. For additional accesses we will do something similar, but with a .additional file.
The branch to implement this adds many tests and maintains 100% test coverage (python coverage). autopkgtests are also added and all pass.
Testing:
- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/ClickAppArmor: INPROGRESS
- internal testsuite: PASS
- autopkgtest: PASS
- manual testing on snappy to verify it implements the feature: PASS |
In order to support hardware access as described in this thread:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/snappy-devel/2015-January/000134.html
we need a mechanism to extend the security json. Last cycle, we implemented overrides using a .override file. For additional accesses we will do something similar, but with a .additional file.
The branch to implement this adds many tests and maintains 100% test coverage (python coverage). autopkgtests are also added.
Testing:
- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/ClickAppArmor: INPROGRESS
- internal testsuite: PASS
- autopkgtest: PASS
- manual testing on snappy to verify it implements the feature: PASS |
|
| 2015-02-25 23:20:28 |
Jamie Strandboge |
description |
In order to support hardware access as described in this thread:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/snappy-devel/2015-January/000134.html
we need a mechanism to extend the security json. Last cycle, we implemented overrides using a .override file. For additional accesses we will do something similar, but with a .additional file.
The branch to implement this adds many tests and maintains 100% test coverage (python coverage). autopkgtests are also added.
Testing:
- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/ClickAppArmor: INPROGRESS
- internal testsuite: PASS
- autopkgtest: PASS
- manual testing on snappy to verify it implements the feature: PASS |
In order to support hardware access as described in this thread:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/snappy-devel/2015-January/000134.html
we need a mechanism to extend the security json. Last cycle, we implemented overrides using a .override file. For additional accesses we will do something similar, but with a .additional file.
The branch to implement this adds many tests and maintains 100% test coverage (python coverage). autopkgtests are also added.
Testing:
- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/ClickAppArmor: INPROGRESS
- internal testsuite: PASS
- autopkgtest: PASS
- manual testing on snappy to verify it implements the feature: PASS
The click-apparmor test plan covers Touch. These changes are not used by anything on the touch images. |
|
| 2015-02-26 14:29:20 |
Jamie Strandboge |
description |
In order to support hardware access as described in this thread:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/snappy-devel/2015-January/000134.html
we need a mechanism to extend the security json. Last cycle, we implemented overrides using a .override file. For additional accesses we will do something similar, but with a .additional file.
The branch to implement this adds many tests and maintains 100% test coverage (python coverage). autopkgtests are also added.
Testing:
- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/ClickAppArmor: INPROGRESS
- internal testsuite: PASS
- autopkgtest: PASS
- manual testing on snappy to verify it implements the feature: PASS
The click-apparmor test plan covers Touch. These changes are not used by anything on the touch images. |
In order to support hardware access as described in this thread:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/snappy-devel/2015-January/000134.html
we need a mechanism to extend the security json. Last cycle, we implemented overrides using a .override file. For additional accesses we will do something similar, but with a .additional file.
The branch to implement this adds many tests and maintains 100% test coverage (python coverage). autopkgtests are also added.
Testing:
- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/ClickAppArmor: PASS
- internal testsuite: PASS
- autopkgtest: PASS
- manual testing on snappy to verify it implements the feature: PASS
The click-apparmor test plan covers Touch. These changes are not used by anything on the touch images. |
|
| 2015-02-26 14:31:01 |
Jamie Strandboge |
description |
In order to support hardware access as described in this thread:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/snappy-devel/2015-January/000134.html
we need a mechanism to extend the security json. Last cycle, we implemented overrides using a .override file. For additional accesses we will do something similar, but with a .additional file.
The branch to implement this adds many tests and maintains 100% test coverage (python coverage). autopkgtests are also added.
Testing:
- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/ClickAppArmor: PASS
- internal testsuite: PASS
- autopkgtest: PASS
- manual testing on snappy to verify it implements the feature: PASS
The click-apparmor test plan covers Touch. These changes are not used by anything on the touch images. |
In order to support hardware access as described in this thread:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/snappy-devel/2015-January/000134.html
we need a mechanism to extend the security json. Last cycle, we implemented overrides using a .override file. For additional accesses we will do something similar, but with a .additional file.
The branch to implement this adds many tests and maintains 100% test coverage (python coverage). autopkgtests are also added. Packages are available in https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security-proposed/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+packages.
Testing:
- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/ClickAppArmor: PASS
- internal testsuite: PASS
- autopkgtest: PASS
- manual testing on snappy to verify it implements the feature: PASS
The click-apparmor test plan covers Touch. These changes are not used by anything on the touch images. |
|
| 2015-02-26 14:31:13 |
Jamie Strandboge |
description |
In order to support hardware access as described in this thread:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/snappy-devel/2015-January/000134.html
we need a mechanism to extend the security json. Last cycle, we implemented overrides using a .override file. For additional accesses we will do something similar, but with a .additional file.
The branch to implement this adds many tests and maintains 100% test coverage (python coverage). autopkgtests are also added. Packages are available in https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security-proposed/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+packages.
Testing:
- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/ClickAppArmor: PASS
- internal testsuite: PASS
- autopkgtest: PASS
- manual testing on snappy to verify it implements the feature: PASS
The click-apparmor test plan covers Touch. These changes are not used by anything on the touch images. |
In order to support hardware access as described in this thread:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/snappy-devel/2015-January/000134.html
we need a mechanism to extend the security json. Last cycle, we implemented overrides using a .override file. For additional accesses we will do something similar, but with a .additional file.
The branch to implement this adds many tests and maintains 100% test coverage (python coverage). autopkgtests are also added. Packages and build logs are available in https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-security-proposed/+archive/ubuntu/ppa/+packages.
Testing:
- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Process/Merges/TestPlans/ClickAppArmor: PASS
- internal testsuite: PASS
- autopkgtest: PASS
- manual testing on snappy to verify it implements the feature: PASS
The click-apparmor test plan covers Touch. These changes are not used by anything on the touch images. |
|
| 2015-02-26 14:31:46 |
Jamie Strandboge |
summary |
[FFe] implement mechanism for adding access to security policy |
[FFe] implement mechanism for additional access to security policy for snappy |
|
| 2015-02-26 14:31:55 |
Jamie Strandboge |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Ubuntu Release Team |
| 2015-02-26 14:32:36 |
Jamie Strandboge |
click-apparmor (Ubuntu): status |
In Progress |
Confirmed |
|
| 2015-02-26 15:10:54 |
Scott Kitterman |
click-apparmor (Ubuntu): status |
Confirmed |
Triaged |
|
| 2015-02-26 17:28:39 |
Launchpad Janitor |
branch linked |
|
lp:ubuntu/vivid-proposed/click-apparmor |
|
| 2015-02-26 17:52:47 |
Launchpad Janitor |
click-apparmor (Ubuntu): status |
Triaged |
Fix Released |
|
