| 2008-09-25 06:35:32 |
dothebart |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
| 2008-09-25 06:49:29 |
Daniel Holbach |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Ubuntu Sponsors for universe |
| 2008-09-29 12:42:34 |
James Westby |
citadel: status |
New |
Incomplete |
|
| 2008-09-29 12:42:34 |
James Westby |
citadel: importance |
Undecided |
Wishlist |
|
| 2008-09-29 12:42:34 |
James Westby |
citadel: statusexplanation |
|
Hi,
Thanks for taking an interest in Ubuntu's package.
The problem with doing this is that the package now Build-Depends on
libcitadel-dev >= 7.37, which is not in Ubuntu.
Assuming this version is really required it would need to be updated
as well. I assume that would need a feature freeze exception (unless
it's just a bugfix release).
There would then be a trade-off of doing the update of libcitadel
against not pulling in the new bug fixes in citadel. How important
are the bug fixes? Would it be possible to pull them without increasing
the build dependency?
I'm un-subscribing the sponsors team for now, please re-subscribe them
when ready. I'll remain subscribed to answer any questions you have.
Thanks,
James
|
|
| 2008-10-10 13:09:26 |
James Westby |
bug |
|
|
added attachment 'citadel.build' (citadel.build) |
| 2008-10-10 13:09:47 |
James Westby |
bug |
|
|
added attachment 'citadel.diffstat' (citadel.diffstat) |
| 2008-10-10 13:10:47 |
James Westby |
bug |
|
|
added attachment 'libcitadel.build' (libcitadel.build) |
| 2008-10-10 13:11:09 |
James Westby |
bug |
|
|
added attachment 'libcitadel.diffstat' (libcitadel.diffstat) |
| 2008-10-10 13:11:31 |
James Westby |
bug |
|
|
added attachment 'webcit.build' (webcit.build) |
| 2008-10-10 13:11:50 |
James Westby |
bug |
|
|
added attachment 'webcit.diffstat' (webcit.diffstat) |
| 2008-10-10 13:12:03 |
James Westby |
citadel: status |
Incomplete |
New |
|
| 2008-10-10 13:12:03 |
James Westby |
citadel: statusexplanation |
Hi,
Thanks for taking an interest in Ubuntu's package.
The problem with doing this is that the package now Build-Depends on
libcitadel-dev >= 7.37, which is not in Ubuntu.
Assuming this version is really required it would need to be updated
as well. I assume that would need a feature freeze exception (unless
it's just a bugfix release).
There would then be a trade-off of doing the update of libcitadel
against not pulling in the new bug fixes in citadel. How important
are the bug fixes? Would it be possible to pull them without increasing
the build dependency?
I'm un-subscribing the sponsors team for now, please re-subscribe them
when ready. I'll remain subscribed to answer any questions you have.
Thanks,
James
|
|
|
| 2008-10-10 13:12:14 |
James Westby |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber MOTU Release Team |
| 2008-10-10 13:12:56 |
James Westby |
title |
citadel package out of sync |
Please update citadel from Debian |
|
| 2008-10-13 18:56:21 |
Luca Falavigna |
citadel: status |
New |
Confirmed |
|
| 2008-10-13 18:56:21 |
Luca Falavigna |
citadel: statusexplanation |
|
Fine from me too, FFe granted. |
|
| 2008-10-14 11:41:49 |
James Westby |
title |
Please update citadel from Debian |
Please citadel 7.37-5 (universe) from Debian unstable (main) |
|
| 2008-10-14 11:42:00 |
James Westby |
bug |
|
|
added subscriber Ubuntu Package Archive Administrators |
| 2008-10-20 07:22:57 |
Steve Langasek |
citadel: status |
Confirmed |
Fix Released |
|
| 2008-10-20 07:22:57 |
Steve Langasek |
citadel: statusexplanation |
Fine from me too, FFe granted. |
|
|
