chromium-browser crashed with SIGSEGV in gethostbyname2_r()

Bug #954795 reported by Juan Salamanca
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
chromium-browser (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

In gnome-shell, trying to launch chromium just after login.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: chromium-browser 17.0.963.79~r125985-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-18.29-generic-pae 3.2.9
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-18-generic-pae i686
ApportVersion: 1.94.1-0ubuntu2
Architecture: i386
CrashCounter: 1
Date: Wed Mar 14 08:12:26 2012
Desktop-Session:
 DESKTOP_SESSION = gnome-classic
 XDG_CONFIG_DIRS = /etc/xdg/xdg-gnome-classic:/etc/xdg
 XDG_DATA_DIRS = /usr/share/gnome-classic:/usr/share/gnome:/usr/local/share/:/usr/share/
Env:
 MOZ_PLUGIN_PATH = None
 LD_LIBRARY_PATH = None
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser
ExecutableTimestamp: 1331531570
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 10.04 LTS "Lucid Lynx" - Release i386 (20100429)
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser
ProcCwd: /home/juan
ProcEnviron:

SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0xb29e1005: lock xadd %ecx,0xc(%eax)
 PC (0xb29e1005) ok
 source "%ecx" ok
 destination "0xc(%eax)" (0x0000000b) not located in a known VMA region (needed writable region)!
 Stack memory exhausted (SP below stack segment)
SegvReason: writing NULL VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: chromium-browser
StacktraceTop:
 ?? () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 ?? () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 ?? () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 ?? () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 gethostbyname2_r () from /lib/i386-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
Title: chromium-browser crashed with SIGSEGV in gethostbyname2_r()
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-03-08 (6 days ago)
UserGroups: adm admin audio cdrom dialout lp lpadmin plugdev sambashare vboxusers
chromium-default: CHROMIUM_FLAGS=""

Revision history for this message
Juan Salamanca (juan-m-salamanca) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #929219, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

visibility: private → public
visibility: private → public
tags: removed: need-i386-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.