chromium-browser crashed with SIGSEGV in getaddrinfo()

Bug #952853 reported by James Tunnicliffe
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
chromium-browser (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Was launching chromium using the Unity launcher.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: chromium-browser 17.0.963.79~r125985-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-18.29-generic 3.2.9
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-18-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 1.94.1-0ubuntu2
Architecture: amd64
Date: Mon Mar 12 10:13:11 2012
Desktop-Session:
 DESKTOP_SESSION = ubuntu
 XDG_CONFIG_DIRS = /etc/xdg/xdg-ubuntu:/etc/xdg
 XDG_DATA_DIRS = /usr/share/ubuntu:/usr/share/gnome:/usr/local/share/:/usr/share/
Env:
 MOZ_PLUGIN_PATH = None
 LD_LIBRARY_PATH = None
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Alpha amd64 (20120309)
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/chromium-browser/chromium-browser
ProcEnviron:

SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x7f5bc1344bfe: lock xadd %eax,0x18(%rdi)
 PC (0x7f5bc1344bfe) ok
 source "%eax" ok
 destination "0x18(%rdi)" (0x00000017) not located in a known VMA region (needed writable region)!
 Stack memory exhausted (SP below stack segment)
SegvReason: writing NULL VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: chromium-browser
StacktraceTop:
 ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 getaddrinfo () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 ?? ()
Title: chromium-browser crashed with SIGSEGV in getaddrinfo()
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-03-12 (0 days ago)
UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo
chromium-default: CHROMIUM_FLAGS=""

Revision history for this message
James Tunnicliffe (dooferlad) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #931082, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

visibility: private → public
visibility: private → public
tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.