Ubuntu

[SRU] radosgw init script missing from 0.64 onwards.

Reported by James Page on 2013-11-27
8
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
ceph (Ubuntu)
Status tracked in Trusty
Saucy
High
Unassigned
Trusty
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

[Impact]
RADOS Gateway users upgrading from raring that rely on the init script to start the radosgw will be broken as the init script has been replaces by a non-equivalent upstart configuration

[Test Case]
sudo service radosgw start
(starts upstart configuration which is actually an instance type upstart config).
radosgw process is not started.

[Regression Potential]
The fix is to rename the radosgw upstart configuration to radosgw-instance so that both the upstart configurations and the init script get installed; the radosgw-instance upstart configuration is started by the radosgw event so should still work OK.

[Original Bug Report]
The radosgw upstart configurations started shipping in 13.10; however one namespace conflicts with the radosgw init script but does not do the same thing; so upgrades will break.

Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package ceph - 0.72.1-3

---------------
ceph (0.72.1-3) unstable; urgency=low

  * d/rules,ceph.install: Correct install paths for ceph-* helpers.
  * d/p/modules: Mark libcls_kvs.so as module.
  * d/rules: Rename radosgw upstart configuration to radosgw-instance to
    avoid namespace conflict with init script which breaks backwards
    compatibility (LP: #1255464).

 -- James Page <email address hidden> Wed, 27 Nov 2013 10:52:48 +0000

Changed in ceph (Ubuntu Trusty):
status: New → Fix Released
James Page (james-page) on 2013-11-27
Changed in ceph (Ubuntu Saucy):
status: New → In Progress
importance: Undecided → High
James Page (james-page) on 2013-11-28
description: updated
James Page (james-page) on 2013-11-29
summary: - radosgw init script missing from 0.64 onwards.
+ [SRU] radosgw init script missing from 0.64 onwards.

Hello James, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ceph into saucy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/0.67.4-0ubuntu2.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance!

Changed in ceph (Ubuntu Saucy):
status: In Progress → Fix Committed
tags: added: verification-needed
James Page (james-page) wrote :

Verification failed; the upgrade does not remove the radosgw.conf configuration so service still tries to use the obsolete upstart configuration.

tags: added: verification-failed
removed: verification-needed
James Page (james-page) wrote :

I've uploaded an additional fix for this package to -proposed to rename the upstart configuration correctly.

Brian Murray (brian-murray) wrote :

Hello James, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ceph into saucy-proposed. The package will build now and be available at http://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ceph/0.67.4-0ubuntu2.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, and change the tag from verification-needed to verification-done. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed. In either case, details of your testing will help us make a better decision.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance!

tags: removed: verification-failed
tags: added: verification-needed
James Page (james-page) wrote :

Upgraded a base saucy radosgw; init script was left intact and the radosgw upstart config was renamed correctly.

tags: added: verification-done
removed: verification-needed

The verification of the Stable Release Update for ceph has completed successfully and the package has now been released to -updates. Subsequently, the Ubuntu Stable Release Updates Team is being unsubscribed and will not receive messages about this bug report. In the event that you encounter a regression using the package from -updates please report a new bug using ubuntu-bug and tag the bug report regression-update so we can easily find any regresssions.

Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package ceph - 0.67.4-0ubuntu2.2

---------------
ceph (0.67.4-0ubuntu2.2) saucy-proposed; urgency=medium

  * d/radosgw.postinst,postrm,preinst: Handle renaming of radosgw upstart
    configuration@0.67.4-0ubuntu2.1.

ceph (0.67.4-0ubuntu2.1) saucy-proposed; urgency=low

  * Fix namespace conflict between init script and upstart configurations
    which breaks backwards compatibility of radosgw startup (LP: #1255464):
    - d/rules: Rename radosgw upstart configuration to radosgw-instance to
      avoid conflict with radosgw init script.
 -- James Page <email address hidden> Thu, 16 Jan 2014 08:58:04 +0000

Changed in ceph (Ubuntu Saucy):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  Edit
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers