Am Dienstag, 11. März 2008 10:06 schrieb Martin Pitt:
> (I fixed the description to correct the directions)
thanks.
>
> Indeed this can happen. We don't support partial upgrades, so it's not
> such a big deal (thus the bug priority), but it's a pathological case.
> Question is whether we want to sacrifice a lot of disk space just to
> support partial upgrades without losing some files, and I don't even
> think that this happens often. Did you actually see this case in
> practice?
>
I didn't see this happen in practice, and agree that it is a pathological
case.
It might be a good idea though, to not diverge from unstable in regards to
build-tools too much, I guess.
Of course I can also understand the goal to save space on the cds. Hence I
wouldn't mind if you mark the bug as won't fix, and consider it again if real
breakage should happen.
Hi,
Am Dienstag, 11. März 2008 10:06 schrieb Martin Pitt:
> (I fixed the description to correct the directions)
thanks.
>
> Indeed this can happen. We don't support partial upgrades, so it's not
> such a big deal (thus the bug priority), but it's a pathological case.
> Question is whether we want to sacrifice a lot of disk space just to
> support partial upgrades without losing some files, and I don't even
> think that this happens often. Did you actually see this case in
> practice?
>
I didn't see this happen in practice, and agree that it is a pathological
case.
It might be a good idea though, to not diverge from unstable in regards to
build-tools too much, I guess.
Of course I can also understand the goal to save space on the cds. Hence I
wouldn't mind if you mark the bug as won't fix, and consider it again if real
breakage should happen.
Cheers,
Stefan.