Activity log for bug #120793

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2007-06-17 07:35:15 Michael Koch bug added bug
2007-06-18 10:32:48 Martin Pitt cdbs: status Unconfirmed In Progress
2007-06-18 10:32:48 Martin Pitt cdbs: importance Undecided Low
2007-06-18 10:32:48 Martin Pitt cdbs: statusexplanation
2007-06-18 10:32:48 Martin Pitt cdbs: assignee pitti
2008-02-27 10:23:37 Martin Pitt cdbs: status In Progress Incomplete
2009-01-27 14:25:09 Martin Pitt cdbs: status Incomplete Invalid
2009-01-27 14:25:09 Martin Pitt cdbs: statusexplanation I don't quite understand this -- why shouldn't the Java runtime be present? It should certainly be a build dependency for Java packages? We are closing this bug report because it lacks the information we need to investigate the problem, as described in the previous comments. Please reopen it if you can give us the missing information, and don't hesitate to submit bug reports in the future. To reopen the bug report you can click on the current status, under the Status column, and change the Status back to "New". Thanks again!