cairo-5c ftbfs in quantal
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
cairo-5c (Debian) |
Fix Released
|
Unknown
|
|||
cairo-5c (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
High
|
Unassigned | ||
freetype (Ubuntu) |
Invalid
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
cairo ftbfs in quantal, failing some test cases. quantal and sid use the same cairo version, but the tests fail in quantal and succeed in sid.
set-font failed: pixel mismatch 0xe0000000 not similar to 0x0 at 22 10
set-font-size failed: pixel mismatch 0xf8000000 not similar to 0x0 at 56 12
set-font-matrix failed: pixel mismatch 0xf8000000 not similar to 0x0 at 6 22
show-text failed: pixel mismatch 0xe0000000 not similar to 0x0 at 27 10
text-path failed: pixel mismatch 0x5b000000 not similar to 0x44000000 at 53 16
text-extents failed: pixel mismatch 0xff1f1f1f not similar to 0xffffffff at 27 30
font-extents failed: font_extents returned wrong value: {ascent = 11, descent = 3, height = 14, max_x_advance = 16, max_y_advance = 0} != {ascent = 12, descent = 3, height = 14, max_x_advance = 16, max_y_advance = 0}
all the test regressions are font related; sid has freetype 2.4.9, quantal 2.4.10, so either the test cases need adjustment, or this could be a regression in freetype.
Changed in cairo-5c (Debian): | |
status: | Unknown → New |
tags: | added: trusty |
Changed in cairo-5c (Debian): | |
status: | New → Fix Released |
Changed in cairo-5c (Ubuntu): | |
status: | Confirmed → Fix Released |
This same build failure was reported in Debian unstable, before freetype was revved. So this isn't a freetype regression. It still could be a freetype bug at its root, but it looks more likely to be a toolchain regression.