Activity log for bug #1874323

Date Who What changed Old value New value Message
2020-04-22 20:13:44 Sean Burlington bug added bug
2020-05-12 10:54:08 Sean Burlington description I installed cadvisor together with prometheus from ubuntu sources and was puzzled to find a lot of data missing - crucially docker container names Testing on command line I noticed I didn't even get a version output /usr/bin/cadvisor -version cAdvisor version () apt-cache policy cadvisor cadvisor: Installed: 0.27.1+dfsg2-4 Candidate: 0.27.1+dfsg2-4 Version table: *** 0.27.1+dfsg2-4 500 500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu eoan/universe amd64 Packages 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status I then tried downloading the latest stable version from https://github.com/google/cadvisor and it works fine I dropped the binary in place of the Ubuntu version and now have all the data I expected Version info outputs normally /usr/bin/cadvisor -version cAdvisor version v0.35.0 (49033161) At first I thought it might be a docker/cadvisor version issue But as the packaged cadvisor doesn't properly give a version number I wonder if something is wrong with the packaging/build process ? I installed cadvisor together with prometheus from ubuntu sources and was puzzled to find a lot of data missing - crucially docker container names Testing on command line I noticed I didn't even get a version output /usr/bin/cadvisor -version cAdvisor version () apt-cache policy cadvisor cadvisor:   Installed: 0.27.1+dfsg2-4   Candidate: 0.27.1+dfsg2-4   Version table:  *** 0.27.1+dfsg2-4 500         500 http://gb.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu eoan/universe amd64 Packages         100 /var/lib/dpkg/status I then tried downloading the latest stable version from https://github.com/google/cadvisor and it works fine I dropped the binary in place of the Ubuntu version and now have all the data I expected Version info outputs normally /usr/bin/cadvisor -version cAdvisor version v0.35.0 (49033161) At first I thought it might be a docker/cadvisor version issue But as the packaged cadvisor doesn't properly give a version number I wonder if something is wrong with the packaging/build process ?