package libboost-filesystem1.58.0:amd64 1.58.0+dfsg-5ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration

Bug #1631573 reported by Gabor Edgarskins
8
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
boost1.58 (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

New Ubuntu Studio install.

Gives me this error.

I don't know wat do.

System wanted to report it as bug.

I'm thinking of going back to Windows.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: libboost-filesystem1.58.0:amd64 1.58.0+dfsg-5ubuntu3.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.4.0-21.37-lowlatency 4.4.6
Uname: Linux 4.4.0-21-lowlatency x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.1
Architecture: amd64
Date: Sat Oct 8 02:11:07 2016
DpkgHistoryLog:
 Start-Date: 2016-10-08 02:11:02
 Commandline: /usr/bin/unattended-upgrade
 Upgrade: chromium-codecs-ffmpeg-extra:amd64 (52.0.2743.116-0ubuntu0.16.04.1.1250, 53.0.2785.143-0ubuntu0.16.04.1.1254), oxideqt-codecs-extra:amd64 (1.17.7-0ubuntu0.16.04.1, 1.17.9-0ubuntu0.16.04.1)
DuplicateSignature:
 package:libboost-filesystem1.58.0:amd64:1.58.0+dfsg-5ubuntu3.1
 Unpacking oxideqt-codecs-extra:amd64 (1.17.9-0ubuntu0.16.04.1) over (1.17.7-0ubuntu0.16.04.1) ...
 dpkg: error processing package libboost-filesystem1.58.0:amd64 (--configure):
  package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should
ErrorMessage: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration
InstallationDate: Installed on 2016-09-20 (17 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Studio 16.04 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20160420.1)
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.18.4ubuntu1.1
 apt 1.2.12~ubuntu16.04.1
SourcePackage: boost1.58
Title: package libboost-filesystem1.58.0:amd64 1.58.0+dfsg-5ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

Revision history for this message
Gabor Edgarskins (gedgar) wrote :
tags: removed: need-duplicate-check
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.