bijiben-shell-search-provider crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_is_fundamentally_a()

Bug #2031900 reported by Gene Soo
This bug report is a duplicate of:  Bug #2030468: bijiben package. Edit Remove
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
bijiben (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Error encountered during first boot after installing edubuntu-desktop on Ubuntu Live Server 23.10 Daily build.

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 23.10
Package: bijiben 40.1-6
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 6.3.0-7.7-generic 6.3.5
Uname: Linux 6.3.0-7-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: zfs
ApportVersion: 2.27.0-0ubuntu2
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CurrentDesktop: ubuntu:GNOME
Date: Fri Aug 18 05:12:38 2023
ExecutablePath: /usr/libexec/bijiben-shell-search-provider
InstallationDate: Installed on 2023-08-15 (3 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-Server 23.10 "Mantic Minotaur" - Daily amd64 (20230814)
ProcCmdline: /usr/libexec/bijiben-shell-search-provider
ProcEnviron:
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=<set>
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x7f25a8a90c41 <g_type_check_instance_is_fundamentally_a+17>: mov (%rax),%rax
 PC (0x7f25a8a90c41) ok
 source "(%rax)" (0x7f227a590bc4) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)!
 destination "%rax" ok
SegvReason: reading unknown VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: bijiben
StacktraceTop:
 g_type_check_instance_is_fundamentally_a () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 g_object_unref () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0
Title: bijiben-shell-search-provider crashed with SIGSEGV in g_type_check_instance_is_fundamentally_a()
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lxd plugdev sudo
separator:

Revision history for this message
Gene Soo (genesoo77072) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #2030468, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

information type: Private → Public
tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.