Ubuntu
bcmwl package

package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.100.82.38 bdcom-0ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 2

Bug #793923 reported by Frederolerouge on 2011-06-07

This bug report is a duplicate of: Bug #793890: package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.100.82.38+bdcom-0ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: /var/lib/dpkg/info/bcmwl-kernel-source.postinst: 53: Syntax error: "fi" unexpected (expecting ";;"). Edit Remove

This bug affects 1 person

Affects		Status	Importance	Assigned to	Milestone
	bcmwl (Ubuntu)	New	Undecided	Unassigned

Bug Description

while updating this package, Update Manager gives me information that an error has occured (sorry for my bad english, I'm french)

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: bcmwl-kernel-source 5.100.82.38+bdcom-0ubuntu3.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.38-10.44-generic-pae 2.6.38.7
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-10-generic-pae i686
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
Architecture: i386
Date: Tue Jun 7 10:50:54 2011
ErrorMessage: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 2
SourcePackage: bcmwl
Title: package bcmwl-kernel-source 5.100.82.38+bdcom-0ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur de sortie d'état 2
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to natty on 2011-04-28 (39 days ago)

Tags:

Revision history for this message

Frederolerouge (frederic-hube) wrote on 2011-06-07:

AptOrdering.txt Edit (2.6 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
Dependencies.txt Edit (1.1 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
Df.txt Edit (865 bytes, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
Dmesg.txt Edit (65.8 KiB, text/plain; charset="utf-8")
DpkgTerminalLog.gz Edit (2.5 KiB, application/x-gzip)

Revision history for this message

Robert Roth (evfool) wrote on 2011-06-07:

Thank you for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. This particular bug has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #793890, so it is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Feel free to continue to report any other bugs you may find.
---
Ubuntu Bug Squad volunteer triager
http://wiki.ubuntu.com/BugSquad