bamfdaemon assert failure: bamfdaemon: ../../src/xcb_io.c:273: poll_for_event: Assertion `!xcb_xlib_threads_sequence_lost' failed.

Bug #938875 reported by C de-Avillez
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
bamf (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Not sure what happened. I was happily typing away on a IRC session when I got shown the LightDM login screen again.

I have no clue on how to reproduce...

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: bamfdaemon 0.2.110-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-17.26-generic 3.2.6
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-17-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: wl
ApportVersion: 1.92-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
AssertionMessage: bamfdaemon: ../../src/xcb_io.c:273: poll_for_event: Assertion `!xcb_xlib_threads_sequence_lost' failed.
Date: Wed Feb 22 12:15:17 2012
DuplicateOf: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/927727
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/bamf/bamfdaemon
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/bamf/bamfdaemon
Signal: 6
SourcePackage: bamf
StacktraceTop:
 __assert_fail_base (fmt=<optimized out>, assertion=0x7f4b0b373ad8 "!xcb_xlib_threads_sequence_lost", file=0x7f4b0b373d92 "../../src/xcb_io.c", line=<optimized out>, function=<optimized out>) at assert.c:94
 __GI___assert_fail (assertion=0x7f4b0b373ad8 "!xcb_xlib_threads_sequence_lost", file=0x7f4b0b373d92 "../../src/xcb_io.c", line=273, function=0x7f4b0b373eb8 "poll_for_event") at assert.c:103
 poll_for_event (dpy=<optimized out>) at ../../src/xcb_io.c:270
 poll_for_response (dpy=0xa6b430) at ../../src/xcb_io.c:288
 _XEventsQueued (dpy=0xa6b430, mode=<optimized out>) at ../../src/xcb_io.c:362
Title: bamfdaemon assert failure: bamfdaemon: ../../src/xcb_io.c:273: poll_for_event: Assertion `!xcb_xlib_threads_sequence_lost' failed.
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-01-13 (40 days ago)
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout kismet kvm libvirtd lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo vboxusers

Revision history for this message
C de-Avillez (hggdh2) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #927727, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

visibility: private → public
visibility: private → public
tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.