bamfdaemon crashed with SIGABRT in __GI___assert_fail()

Bug #927727 reported by Stuart Langridge
180
This bug affects 25 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
bamf (Ubuntu)
Expired
Critical
Unassigned

Bug Description

Machine locked up :(

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: bamfdaemon 0.2.108-0ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-14.23-generic 3.2.3
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-14-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 1.91-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
CheckboxSubmission: 4d186c1dd89d3ba4cb89f5ee55713686
CheckboxSystem: bb422ca46d02494cdbc459927a98bc2f
Date: Mon Feb 6 16:44:20 2012
ExecutablePath: /usr/lib/bamf/bamfdaemon
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Alpha amd64 (20111211)
ProcCmdline: /usr/lib/bamf/bamfdaemon
ProcEnviron:
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 PATH=(custom, user)
 LANGUAGE=en_GB:en
 LANG=en_GB.UTF-8
Signal: 6
SourcePackage: bamf
StacktraceTop:
 raise () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 abort () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 __assert_fail () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6
 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6
Title: bamfdaemon crashed with SIGABRT in raise()
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin plugdev sambashare sudo

Revision history for this message
Stuart Langridge (sil) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote :

StacktraceTop:
 __GI___assert_fail (assertion=0x7fd1cf595ad8 "!xcb_xlib_threads_sequence_lost", file=<optimized out>, line=273, function=<optimized out>) at assert.c:81
 poll_for_event (dpy=<optimized out>) at ../../src/xcb_io.c:270
 poll_for_response (dpy=0x2564100) at ../../src/xcb_io.c:288
 _XEventsQueued (dpy=0x2564100, mode=<optimized out>) at ../../src/xcb_io.c:362
 XPending (dpy=0x2564100) at ../../src/Pending.c:55

Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : Stacktrace.txt
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : ThreadStacktrace.txt
Changed in bamf (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Medium
summary: - bamfdaemon crashed with SIGABRT in raise()
+ bamfdaemon crashed with SIGABRT in __GI___assert_fail()
tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

Changed in bamf (Ubuntu):
status: New → Confirmed
C de-Avillez (hggdh2)
visibility: private → public
Revision history for this message
Steve Magoun (smagoun) wrote :

In my case the machine didn't lock up, but my session crashed and I had to log back in.

Revision history for this message
Steve Magoun (smagoun) wrote :

Found this in syslog:

Feb 27 16:34:35 steve-laptop gnome-session[2011]: ******************* START ********************************
Feb 27 16:34:35 steve-laptop gnome-session[2011]: Frame 0: /usr/bin/gnome-session() [0x419bf7]
Feb 27 16:34:35 steve-laptop gnome-session[2011]: Frame 1: /usr/bin/gnome-session() [0x419fda]
Feb 27 16:34:35 steve-laptop gnome-session[2011]: Frame 2: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpthread.so.0(+0xfcb0) [0x7f580a5d6cb0]
Feb 27 16:34:35 steve-laptop gnome-session[2011]: Frame 3: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(gsignal+0x35) [0x7f5809340445]
Feb 27 16:34:35 steve-laptop gnome-session[2011]: Frame 4: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(abort+0x17b) [0x7f5809343bab]
Feb 27 16:34:35 steve-laptop gnome-session[2011]: Frame 5: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x2f10e) [0x7f580933910e]
Feb 27 16:34:35 steve-laptop gnome-session[2011]: Frame 6: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(+0x2f1b2) [0x7f58093391b2]
Feb 27 16:34:35 steve-laptop gnome-session[2011]: Frame 7: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6(+0x3d603) [0x7f580c0cb603]
Feb 27 16:34:35 steve-laptop gnome-session[2011]: Frame 8: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6(+0x3d621) [0x7f580c0cb621]
Feb 27 16:34:35 steve-laptop gnome-session[2011]: Frame 9: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6(_XEventsQueued+0x5d) [0x7f580c0cbd4d]
Feb 27 16:34:35 steve-laptop gnome-session[2011]: Frame 10: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6(XPending+0x5d) [0x7f580c0bd41d]
Feb 27 16:34:35 steve-laptop gnome-session[2011]: Frame 11: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgdk-3.so.0(+0x4d824) [0x7f580b17a824]
Feb 27 16:34:35 steve-laptop gnome-session[2011]: Frame 12: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0(g_main_context_check+0x183) [0x7f580970cb73]
Feb 27 16:34:35 steve-laptop gnome-session[2011]: Frame 13: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0(+0x480d6) [0x7f580970d0d6]
Feb 27 16:34:35 steve-laptop gnome-session[2011]: Frame 14: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libglib-2.0.so.0(g_main_loop_run+0x6a) [0x7f580970d59a]
Feb 27 16:34:35 steve-laptop gnome-session[2011]: Frame 15: /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgtk-3.so.0(gtk_main+0x8d) [0x7f580b54784d]
Feb 27 16:34:35 steve-laptop gnome-session[2011]: Frame 16: /usr/bin/gnome-session() [0x40b668]
Feb 27 16:34:35 steve-laptop gnome-session[2011]: Frame 17: /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xed) [0x7f580932b76d]
Feb 27 16:34:35 steve-laptop gnome-session[2011]: Frame 18: /usr/bin/gnome-session() [0x40b8d5]
Feb 27 16:34:35 steve-laptop gnome-session[2011]: ******************* END **********************************
Feb 27 16:34:35 steve-laptop kernel: [ 8698.137088] compiz[4213]: segfault at 968 ip 00007f01fdbaca46 sp 00007fffe1280700 error 4 in libX11.so.6.3.0[7f01fdb90000+12f000]

Revision history for this message
Clint Byrum (clint-fewbar) wrote :

Affects 11 and booting people out of their sessions .. this seems like it warrants High, or even Critical.

Changed in bamf (Ubuntu):
importance: Medium → Critical
Revision history for this message
Rick McBride (rmcbride) wrote :

Also got this. Session crashed to a degree that I could not switch to an alternate PTTY locally, nor recover through remotely triggered service restart.

Revision history for this message
bjv (bjamesv) wrote :

session crashed, for me and had to log back in.

tags: added: bugpattern-needed
Revision history for this message
madbiologist (me-again) wrote :

Is this still occurring with bamfdaemon 0.2.126-0ubuntu1?

Changed in bamf (Ubuntu):
status: Confirmed → Incomplete
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

[Expired for bamf (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.]

Changed in bamf (Ubuntu):
status: Incomplete → Expired
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.