ayatana-indicator-printers-service crashed with SIGSEGV in __GI_____strtol_l_internal()

Bug #1944612 reported by Togo28
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
ayatana-indicator-printers (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Crash after start

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 21.10
Package: ayatana-indicator-printers 0.8.2-1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 5.13.0-16.16-generic 5.13.13
Uname: Linux 5.13.0-16-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.11-0ubuntu69
Architecture: amd64
CasperMD5CheckResult: pass
CrashCounter: 1
CurrentDesktop: MATE
Date: Wed Sep 22 20:53:38 2021
ExecutablePath: /usr/libexec/ayatana-indicator-printers/ayatana-indicator-printers-service
InstallationDate: Installed on 2021-09-22 (0 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu-MATE 21.10 "Impish Indri" - Beta amd64 (20210922)
ProcCmdline: /usr/libexec/ayatana-indicator-printers/ayatana-indicator-printers-service
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, user)
 XDG_RUNTIME_DIR=<set>
 LANG=de_DE.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SegvAnalysis:
 Segfault happened at: 0x7f71746e655c <__GI_____strtol_l_internal+60>: movsbq 0x0(%r13),%rax
 PC (0x7f71746e655c) ok
 source "0x0(%r13)" (0x00000000) not located in a known VMA region (needed readable region)!
 destination "%rax" ok
SegvReason: reading NULL VMA
Signal: 11
SourcePackage: ayatana-indicator-printers
StacktraceTop:
 __GI_____strtol_l_internal (nptr=0x0, endptr=0x0, base=10, group=0, loc=0x7f71748b4560 <_nl_global_locale>) at ../stdlib/strtol_l.c:292
 ?? ()
 g_type_create_instance () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
 g_object_new_valist () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libgobject-2.0.so.0
Title: ayatana-indicator-printers-service crashed with SIGSEGV in __GI_____strtol_l_internal()
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups: adm cdrom dip lpadmin lxd plugdev sambashare sudo
separator:

Revision history for this message
Togo28 (togo28) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #1916377, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

information type: Private → Public
tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.