Comment 88 for bug 94940

Alexander Menk (alex-menk) wrote :

From https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/.local#Multicast_DNS_standard

"Implementers MAY choose to look up such names concurrently via other mechanisms (e.g., Unicast DNS) and coalesce the results in some fashion. Implementers choosing to do this should be aware of the potential for user confusion when a given name can produce different results depending on external network conditions (such as, but not limited to, which name lookup mechanism responds faster)."

So wouldn't that solve the issue?