package libavahi-core7:amd64 0.6.32~rc+dfsg-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration

Bug #1782202 reported by sachin agrawal
8
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
avahi (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

i am unable to install softwares from ubuntu software.

ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 16.04
Package: libavahi-core7:amd64 0.6.32~rc+dfsg-1ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 4.13.0-38.43~16.04.1-generic 4.13.16
Uname: Linux 4.13.0-38-generic x86_64
ApportVersion: 2.20.1-0ubuntu2.18
Architecture: amd64
Date: Wed Jul 18 02:53:43 2018
Dependencies:
 gcc-6-base 6.0.1-0ubuntu1
 libavahi-common-data 0.6.32~rc+dfsg-1ubuntu2.2
 libavahi-common3 0.6.32~rc+dfsg-1ubuntu2.2
 libc6 2.23-0ubuntu10
 libgcc1 1:6.0.1-0ubuntu1
DpkgHistoryLog:
 Start-Date: 2018-07-18 02:53:26
 Commandline: aptdaemon role='role-install-packages' sender=':1.75'
 Install: chromium-browser:amd64 (66.0.3359.181-0ubuntu0.16.04.1), chromium-codecs-ffmpeg-extra:amd64 (66.0.3359.181-0ubuntu0.16.04.1, automatic), chromium-browser-l10n:amd64 (66.0.3359.181-0ubuntu0.16.04.1, automatic)
DuplicateSignature:
 package:libavahi-core7:amd64:0.6.32~rc+dfsg-1ubuntu2
 Processing triggers for man-db (2.7.5-1) ...
 dpkg: error processing package libavahi-core7:amd64 (--configure):
  package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should
ErrorMessage: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration
InstallationDate: Installed on 2018-01-12 (186 days ago)
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 16.04.3 LTS "Xenial Xerus" - Release amd64 (20170801)
RelatedPackageVersions:
 dpkg 1.18.4ubuntu1.4
 apt 1.2.27
SourcePackage: avahi
Title: package libavahi-core7:amd64 0.6.32~rc+dfsg-1ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: package is in a very bad inconsistent state; you should reinstall it before attempting configuration
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)

Revision history for this message
sachin agrawal (slohiya406) wrote :
tags: removed: need-duplicate-check
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.