autopilot should rather use upstart to stop an application rather than sending sigkill
Bug #1274139 reported by
Didier Roche-Tolomelli
This bug affects 2 people
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Autopilot |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
| autopilot (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
Bug Description
after a discussion with Ricardo M, we think it will be better if autopilot can use upstart to send .
If an application randomly segfault, we would have then some logs about knowing if the application was shutted down properly at the end of test or if it failed to start (even without any segfault). That would greatly improve our analyze for image test results.
Revision history for this message
| Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote | #1 |
| Changed in autopilot (Ubuntu): | |
| status: | New → Confirmed |
| Changed in autopilot (Ubuntu): | |
| assignee: | nobody → rosa maria (rprosamaria383) |
| assignee: | rosa maria (rprosamaria383) → nobody |
| Changed in autopilot: | |
| status: | New → Invalid |
| Changed in autopilot (Ubuntu): | |
| status: | Confirmed → Invalid |
Revision history for this message
| Christopher Lee (veebers) wrote | #3 |
| Changed in autopilot: | |
| status: | Invalid → Fix Released |
| Changed in autopilot (Ubuntu): | |
| status: | Invalid → Fix Released |
To post a comment you must log in.
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.