Missing successor for obsolete packages

Bug #1569168 reported by Hans Ginzel
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
aptitude (Ubuntu)
Expired
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

There is category “Obsolete and Locally Created Packages” in aptitude. But the information which package replaces an obsolete one is missing.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 14.04
Package: aptitude 0.6.8.2-1ubuntu4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.13.0-85.129-generic 3.13.11-ckt36
Uname: Linux 3.13.0-85-generic i686
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 2.14.1-0ubuntu3.20
Architecture: i386
Date: Tue Apr 12 07:21:51 2016
SourcePackage: aptitude
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to trusty on 2014-09-21 (568 days ago)

Revision history for this message
Hans Ginzel (hans-matfyz) wrote :
summary: - Missing sucessor for obsolite package
+ Missing sucessor for obsolete package
Revision history for this message
Axel Beckert (xtaran) wrote : Re: Missing sucessor for obsolete package

Either the according package lists its successor(s) in the Depends field (then it's usually called "transitional package") or there is no (direct) successor at all. That can also happen.

Aptitude doesn't know more than the package (list) tells it.

Or do you have a different idea how Aptitude should list successor packages?

Changed in aptitude (Ubuntu):
status: New → Incomplete
Axel Beckert (xtaran)
summary: - Missing sucessor for obsolete package
+ Missing successor for obsolete packages
Revision history for this message
Hans Ginzel (hans-matfyz) wrote :

How does aptitude determinate that a package is obsolete or locally created, please?

Revision history for this message
Axel Beckert (xtaran) wrote : Re: [Bug 1569168] Re: Missing successor for obsolete packages

Hans Ginzel wrote:
> How does aptitude determinate that a package is obsolete or locally
> created, please?

Citing from
http://aptitude.alioth.debian.org/doc/en/ch02s04s05.html#searchObsolete

  ... any installed package which is not available in any version from
  any archive. These packages appear as “Obsolete or Locally
  Installed” in the visual interface.

  Regards, Axel
--
 ,''`. | Axel Beckert <email address hidden>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5
  `- | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

[Expired for aptitude (Ubuntu) because there has been no activity for 60 days.]

Changed in aptitude (Ubuntu):
status: Incomplete → Expired
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.