does not automatically deinstall libqt4-dev when it should

Bug #1401008 reported by Rolf Leggewie
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
aptitude (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

I observed on my trusty box that aptitude keeps libqt4-dev even though it is marked as automatically installed and no other package depends on or recommends it.

$ sudo aptitude show libqt4-dev|grep Auto
Automatically installed: yes
$ aptitude why libqt4-dev
i postbooks-updater Depends libqt4-sql-psql
i A libqt4-sql-psql Suggests libqt4-dev

In other words, there is no package on the system that at least depends on or recommends libqt4-dev to be installed. Since the package is marked as automatically installed aptitude should offer to remove it which for some unknown reason does not happen

Tags: trusty
Revision history for this message
Rolf Leggewie (r0lf) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Axel Beckert (xtaran) wrote : Re: [Bug 1401008] [NEW] does not automatically deinstall libqt4-dev when it should

Hi Rolf,

Rolf Leggewie wrote:
> I observed on my trusty box that aptitude keeps libqt4-dev even though
> it is marked as automatically installed and no other package depends on
> or recommends it.

But libqt4-sql-psql suggests it:

> $ sudo aptitude show libqt4-dev|grep Auto
> Automatically installed: yes
> $ aptitude why libqt4-dev
> i postbooks-updater Depends libqt4-sql-psql
> i A libqt4-sql-psql Suggests libqt4-dev
>
> In other words, there is no package on the system that at least depends
> on or recommends libqt4-dev to be installed. Since the package is
> marked as automatically installed aptitude should offer to remove it
> which for some unknown reason does not happen

That's on purpose. Suggests also causes a package to be kept if it is
marked as automatically installed. (At least with the default
settings. Not sure if this behaviour actually can be configured.) At
least for me that's also the behaviour I'd expect and consider
appropriate.

If there's no opposition, I'd close it with "invalid" as the described
behaviour is considered a feature and not a bug.

But if you consider that either the (non-) configurability or default
values for this behaviour inappropriate, I suggest to mark it either
as "opinion" or wishlist severity.

  Regards, Axel
--
 ,''`. | Axel Beckert <email address hidden>, http://people.debian.org/~abe/
: :' : | Debian Developer, ftp.ch.debian.org Admin
`. `' | 1024D: F067 EA27 26B9 C3FC 1486 202E C09E 1D89 9593 0EDE
  `- | 4096R: 2517 B724 C5F6 CA99 5329 6E61 2FF9 CD59 6126 16B5

Revision history for this message
Rolf Leggewie (r0lf) wrote :

My bad, closing as invalid.

Thank you for the explanation.

Changed in aptitude (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.