| 2012-08-07 07:08:30 |
Shahar Or |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
| 2012-08-07 07:42:17 |
Daniel Hartwig |
aptitude (Ubuntu): status |
New |
Incomplete |
|
| 2012-08-07 08:08:05 |
Shahar Or |
aptitude (Ubuntu): status |
Incomplete |
New |
|
| 2012-08-07 10:15:32 |
Daniel Hartwig |
aptitude (Ubuntu): status |
New |
Invalid |
|
| 2013-01-28 21:19:35 |
Adrien Beau |
aptitude (Ubuntu): status |
Invalid |
New |
|
| 2013-01-29 03:08:37 |
Daniel Hartwig |
aptitude (Ubuntu): status |
New |
Confirmed |
|
| 2013-01-29 03:09:18 |
Daniel Hartwig |
summary |
both 00aptitude and 05aptitude in /etc/apt/apt.conf.d |
05aptitude (aptitude) contains sudo setting also in 00aptitude (user-setup) |
|
| 2013-01-29 03:09:40 |
Daniel Hartwig |
bug task added |
|
user-setup (Ubuntu) |
|
| 2013-01-29 03:10:08 |
Daniel Hartwig |
user-setup (Ubuntu): status |
New |
Confirmed |
|
| 2013-01-29 03:10:20 |
Daniel Hartwig |
user-setup (Ubuntu): status |
Confirmed |
New |
|
| 2013-01-29 03:10:35 |
Daniel Hartwig |
aptitude (Ubuntu): status |
Confirmed |
New |
|
| 2013-01-29 03:12:08 |
Daniel Hartwig |
summary |
05aptitude (aptitude) contains sudo setting also in 00aptitude (user-setup) |
ubuntu patch 05aptitude (aptitude) contains sudo setting also in 00aptitude (user-setup) |
|
| 2013-01-29 03:19:45 |
Daniel Hartwig |
description |
It doesn't seem right to me...
dpkg -S 00aptitude suggests that no package contains 00aptitude.
dpkg -S 05aptitude suggests that aptitude contains 05aptitude.
So... Perhaps this is a result of a left-over file from an aptitude package upgrade?
Thanks,
Shahar
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
Package: aptitude 0.6.6-1ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-8.8-generic 3.5.0
Uname: Linux 3.5.0-8-generic i686
ApportVersion: 2.4-0ubuntu6
Architecture: i386
Date: Tue Aug 7 10:04:24 2012
EcryptfsInUse: Yes
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Beta i386 (20120421)
ProcEnviron:
TERM=screen-bce
PATH=(custom, no user)
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: aptitude
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to quantal on 2012-07-12 (25 days ago) |
aptitude::Get-Root-Command "sudo:/usr/bin/sudo";
Set in 05aptitude (aptitude) and 00aptitude (user-setup). The user-setup file is generated only if root-login is disabled in the installer and co-incides with settings for other programs to use sudo.
Setting this twice at two different priorities (00 vs. 05) can be problematic if the admin is trying to override the setting. Ubuntu maintainers should decide which is the canonical location for this setting — the older 05aptitude or the more recent 00aptitude — and remove the other.
[ Original Report ]
It doesn't seem right to me...
dpkg -S 00aptitude suggests that no package contains 00aptitude.
dpkg -S 05aptitude suggests that aptitude contains 05aptitude.
So... Perhaps this is a result of a left-over file from an aptitude package upgrade?
Thanks,
Shahar
ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
Package: aptitude 0.6.6-1ubuntu2
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-8.8-generic 3.5.0
Uname: Linux 3.5.0-8-generic i686
ApportVersion: 2.4-0ubuntu6
Architecture: i386
Date: Tue Aug 7 10:04:24 2012
EcryptfsInUse: Yes
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 12.04 LTS "Precise Pangolin" - Beta i386 (20120421)
ProcEnviron:
TERM=screen-bce
PATH=(custom, no user)
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: aptitude
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to quantal on 2012-07-12 (25 days ago) |
|
| 2013-05-29 03:41:29 |
Daniel Hartwig |
user-setup (Ubuntu): status |
New |
Invalid |
|
| 2013-05-29 03:41:51 |
Daniel Hartwig |
aptitude (Ubuntu): status |
New |
Confirmed |
|
| 2013-09-23 18:31:52 |
Brian Murray |
aptitude (Ubuntu): status |
Confirmed |
Triaged |
|
| 2013-09-23 18:31:54 |
Brian Murray |
aptitude (Ubuntu): importance |
Undecided |
High |
|
| 2013-09-24 01:27:30 |
Launchpad Janitor |
branch linked |
|
lp:ubuntu/aptitude |
|
| 2013-09-24 02:32:46 |
Launchpad Janitor |
branch linked |
|
lp:ubuntu/saucy-proposed/aptitude |
|
| 2013-09-26 17:26:44 |
Launchpad Janitor |
aptitude (Ubuntu): status |
Triaged |
Fix Released |
|
