software-center crashed with AptDaemonError in _medium_required(): org.debian.apt: Could not cancel transaction
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
aptdaemon (Ubuntu) |
Won't Fix
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
software-center (Ubuntu) |
Won't Fix
|
High
|
andria |
Bug Description
Binary package hint: software-center
unexpected crash
ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.04
Package: software-center 3.1.25
ProcVersionSign
Uname: Linux 2.6.38-7-generic i686
NonfreeKernelMo
Architecture: i386
Date: Tue Apr 5 09:45:39 2011
ExecutablePath: /usr/share/
InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.7
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/bin/
ProcEnviron:
LANGUAGE=en_US:en
LANG=en_US.UTF-8
SHELL=/bin/bash
PythonArgs: ['/usr/
SourcePackage: software-center
Title: software-center crashed with AptDaemonError in _medium_required(): org.debian.apt: Could not cancel transaction
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups: adm admin cdrom dialout lpadmin plugdev sambashare
tags: | removed: need-duplicate-check |
Changed in software-center (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
Changed in software-center (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Medium → Undecided |
tags: | removed: patch |
Changed in software-center (Ubuntu): | |
importance: | Undecided → High |
Changed in aptdaemon (Ubuntu): | |
status: | New → Confirmed |
Changed in software-center (Ubuntu): | |
assignee: | nobody → shaun gad (hellokeltyhere) |
Changed in aptdaemon (Ubuntu): | |
assignee: | nobody → shaun gad (hellokeltyhere) |
Changed in aptdaemon (Ubuntu): | |
assignee: | shaun gad (hellokeltyhere) → nobody |
Changed in software-center (Ubuntu): | |
assignee: | shaun gad (hellokeltyhere) → nobody |
Changed in software-center (Ubuntu): | |
assignee: | nobody → andria (nanang-bandriana) |
tags: | removed: natty |
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug and helping to make Ubuntu better. We appreciate the difficulties you are facing, but this appears to be a "regular" (non-security) bug. I have unmarked it as a security issue since this bug does not show evidence of allowing attackers to cross privilege boundaries nor directly cause loss of data/privacy. Please feel free to report any other bugs you may find.