breezy-backports doesn't exist yet

Bug #24106 reported by Jeremy LaCroix
10
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
apt (Ubuntu)
Fix Released
High
James Troup

Bug Description

I know you guys don't support Backports, but it is in the Sources.list file when
you install the final Ubuntu, although commented out, it doesn't work. I don't
need it but its wierd to have a dead repository on a final version of an OS.

Revision history for this message
Daniel Robitaille (robitaille) wrote :

The rational for adding them in the source.list file is explained in bug #21290

Revision history for this message
Matthew East (mdke) wrote :

This is causing major problems: users are uncommenting the backports
repositories and getting errors because the repo is not created yet. Bumping
this up to major because it affects a large number of people. The solution (IMO)
is to create the archive but not add anything to it until dapper opens. Please
advise the Documentation team on what solution is going to be adopted for
dapper, so that we can ensure a note is present in the documentation (which
currently simply explains how to activate breezy-backports).

Revision history for this message
Jonathan Jesse (jjesse) wrote :

\

Revision history for this message
Matthew East (mdke) wrote :

now it does. Closing bug.

Revision history for this message
Jeremy LaCroix (jlacroix82-deactivatedaccount) wrote :

No it doesn't, myself and people in the forum can't get it to work.

W: Couldn't stat source package list http://us.archive.ubuntu.com
breezy-backports/main Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists/us.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_breezy-backports_main_binary-i386_Packages)
- stat (2 No such file or directory)
W: Couldn't stat source package list http://us.archive.ubuntu.com
breezy-backports/restricted Packages
(/var/lib/apt/lists/us.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_breezy-backports_restricted_binary-i386_Packages)
- stat (2 No such file or directory)
W: You may want to run apt-get update to correct these problems
E: Some index files failed to download, they have been ignored, or old ones used
instead.

Revision history for this message
Matthew East (mdke) wrote :

(In reply to comment #5)
> No it doesn't, myself and people in the forum can't get it to work.

yes it does. See http://archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/breezy-backports/

If it is not working, that is a separate problem. Please change the bug
description or file a new bug.

I won't close this for now, but you can do so if you file a separate bug.

Revision history for this message
Jeremy LaCroix (jlacroix82-deactivatedaccount) wrote :

I filed a new bug.

Revision history for this message
Matt Zimmerman (mdz) wrote :

Closing again

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.