| 2007-08-06 07:42:17 |
Kiwinote |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
| 2007-09-07 18:02:55 |
Kiwinote |
description |
Binary package hint: apt
I have noticed that the apt-cache -v output in gutsy is different than those in previous releases:
- gutsy has 'i386' instead of 'linux i386' (not really an issue)
- gutsy has two (2) whitespaces after 'aug' (minor issue)
(and if I can ask a question at the same time: Is there a command to get only the architecture apt was compiled for, ie in my case 'i386'? (The nth word of apt-cache -v shouldn't work because of language issues))
=================================
root@four:/# lsb_release -cs && apt-cache -v
dapper
apt 0.6.43.3ubuntu2 for linux i386 compiled on Apr 18 2006 19:46:35
root@four:/# lsb_release -cs && apt-cache -v
edgy
apt 0.6.45ubuntu14 for linux i386 compiled on Sep 27 2006 23:43:22
root@four:/# lsb_release -cs && apt-cache -v
feisty
apt 0.6.46.4ubuntu10 for linux i386 compiled on Mar 14 2007 17:43:20
kiwinote@four:~$ lsb_release -cs && apt-cache -v
gutsy
apt 0.7.6ubuntu1 for i386 compiled on Aug 4 2007 00:21:55 |
Binary package hint: apt
I have noticed that the apt-cache -v output in gutsy is different than those in previous releases:
- gutsy has 'i386' instead of 'linux i386' (not really an issue)
- gutsy has two (2) whitespaces after 'aug' (minor issue)
=================================
root@four:/# lsb_release -cs && apt-cache -v
dapper
apt 0.6.43.3ubuntu2 for linux i386 compiled on Apr 18 2006 19:46:35
root@four:/# lsb_release -cs && apt-cache -v
edgy
apt 0.6.45ubuntu14 for linux i386 compiled on Sep 27 2006 23:43:22
root@four:/# lsb_release -cs && apt-cache -v
feisty
apt 0.6.46.4ubuntu10 for linux i386 compiled on Mar 14 2007 17:43:20
kiwinote@four:~$ lsb_release -cs && apt-cache -v
gutsy
apt 0.7.6ubuntu1 for i386 compiled on Aug 4 2007 00:21:55 |
|
| 2008-10-14 20:38:26 |
Daniel T Chen |
apt: status |
New |
Incomplete |
|
| 2008-10-14 20:38:26 |
Daniel T Chen |
apt: statusexplanation |
|
It's unclear what the reported "bug" seems to be. Are you implying that the output from `apt-cache -v' is sufficiently differently that it constitutes a regression? E.g., breaks a mission-critical tool that you're using |
|
| 2008-10-15 09:19:51 |
Kiwinote |
apt: status |
Incomplete |
Fix Released |
|
| 2008-10-15 09:19:51 |
Kiwinote |
apt: statusexplanation |
It's unclear what the reported "bug" seems to be. Are you implying that the output from `apt-cache -v' is sufficiently differently that it constitutes a regression? E.g., breaks a mission-critical tool that you're using |
The problem was that in gutsy there were two whitespaces after the month instead of one (although launchpad removes double whitespaces). This broke a script of mine at the time. By the looks of it the 'bug' is no longer around in Hardy, so it seems to be solved. |
|
