please add security.ubuntu.com to the ubuntu mirrors
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| | apt-cacher-ng (Ubuntu) |
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
Bug Description
Please add http://
| Micah Gersten (micahg) wrote : | #2 |
It looks like I might have misunderstood the use here, I'm hoping Marc can clarify whether or not this is actually helpful
| Changed in apt-cacher-ng (Ubuntu): | |
| status: | Invalid → New |
| Rolf Leggewie (r0lf) wrote : | #3 |
We should also wait for input from Eduard who maintains the package in Debian as well as being the upstream dev (thanks for your work!). More specifically, what happens if one of the mirrors in the pool is only a partial mirror? Will that possibly lead to problems?
| description: | updated |
| Marc Deslauriers (mdeslaur) wrote : | #4 |
This shouldn't be needed. Not only is the security pocket available on all regular mirrors, but security updates also get copied to the -updates pocket after a few minutes.
The only reason we preconfigure security.ubuntu.com by default is to make sure users get security updates even when their local mirror isn't working properly.
| Rolf Leggewie (r0lf) wrote : | #5 |
Marc, of course this isn't necessary. Acng isn't necessary. Apt can work just fine downloading each and every *.deb file for every client. Caching is totally optional. Yet, why download the same package again when it is already there locally? To avoid duplicate downloads of the same information is the whole point of acng and caching. And to that end, the proposed change should be made in my opinion.
| Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote : | #6 |
Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.
| Changed in apt-cacher-ng (Ubuntu): | |
| status: | New → Confirmed |
| tags: | added: precise |


I don't believe this to be correct, as that's really only a temporary mirror for security updates, see https:/ /wiki.ubuntu. com/ArchiveAdmi nistration# Copying_ security_ uploads_ to_updates for more information