apport-gtk crashed with SIGABRT in raise()

Bug #933263 reported by 工业废气
0
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
apport (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

并不影响正常使用
Does not affect the normal use

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: apport-gtk 1.91-0ubuntu1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-16.25-generic 3.2.6
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-16-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: nvidia
ApportVersion: 1.91-0ubuntu1
Architecture: amd64
CrashReports:
 640:0:0:11197542:2012-02-16 11:59:42.804833000 +0800:2012-02-16 11:59:49.303608812 +0800:/var/crash/_usr_share_apport_apport-gtk.0.crash
 600:0:0:747212:2012-02-16 11:59:09.319933000 +0800:2012-02-16 11:59:10.319933000 +0800:/var/crash/_usr_bin_lpstat.0.crash
 640:0:0:25239:2012-02-16 11:51:55.183824000 +0800:2012-02-16 11:58:45.671493431 +0800:/var/crash/_usr_sbin_aptd.0.crash
 640:0:0:10282:2012-02-16 02:13:07.225660000 +0800:2012-02-16 11:58:48.540941651 +0800:/var/crash/_usr_bin_update-manager.0.crash
Date: Thu Feb 16 11:59:23 2012
ExecutablePath: /usr/share/apport/apport-gtk
InstallationMedia: Ubuntu 11.10 "Oneiric Ocelot" - Release amd64 (20111012)
InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python2.7
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python /usr/share/apport/apport-gtk
Signal: 6
SourcePackage: apport
StacktraceTop:
 raise () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 abort () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 __assert_fail () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6
Title: apport-gtk crashed with SIGABRT in raise()
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to precise on 2012-02-15 (0 days ago)
UserGroups:

Revision history for this message
工业废气 (wodewodewode) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #901675, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

visibility: private → public
visibility: private → public
tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.