UpgradeStatus date is wrong when system is upgraded through sources.list change

Bug #788936 reported by Micah Gersten on 2011-05-27
18
This bug affects 3 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
apport (Ubuntu)
Low
Unassigned

Bug Description

Binary package hint: apport

Apport says I upgrade to oneiric 81 days ago when that is when I upgraded to natty. I think it's confused since I upgrade through changing my sources file and didn't wait for update-manager to handle it. However, it should still reflect the correct upgrade date or not include it. Perhaps a check to see if the date for the last upgrade was to the current release the machine is on.

ProblemType: Bug
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 11.10
Package: apport 1.20.1-0ubuntu6
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 2.6.39-3.9-generic 2.6.39
Uname: Linux 2.6.39-3-generic x86_64
ApportLog:

Architecture: amd64
Date: Thu May 26 22:30:03 2011
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcEnviron:
 LANGUAGE=en_US:en
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=C
 LC_MESSAGES=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
SourcePackage: apport
UpgradeStatus: Upgraded to oneiric on 2011-03-06 (81 days ago)

Micah Gersten (micahg) wrote :
Jean-Baptiste Lallement (jibel) wrote :

Thanks for your report. I confirm this issue. Setting to triaged/low because that's an erroneous information and it's confusing but has a low impact on the quality of the report.

Changed in apport (Ubuntu):
importance: Undecided → Low
status: New → Triaged
summary: - Apport attached incorrect upgrade information
+ UpgradeStatus date is wrong when system is upgraded through sources.list
+ change
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  Edit
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers