apport-gtk crashed with SIGABRT in raise()

Bug #1046025 reported by Roman Stingler
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
apport (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

crashed when reopening opera

ProblemType: Crash
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.10
Package: apport-gtk 2.5.1-0ubuntu4
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.5.0-13.14-generic 3.5.3
Uname: Linux 3.5.0-13-generic x86_64
ApportLog:
 ERROR: apport (pid 8853) Tue Sep 4 21:50:57 2012: called for pid 2562, signal 6, core limit 0
 ERROR: apport (pid 8853) Tue Sep 4 21:50:57 2012: script: /usr/share/apport/apport-gtk, interpreted by /usr/bin/python3.2mu (command line "/usr/bin/python3 /usr/share/apport/apport-gtk")
 ERROR: apport (pid 8853) Tue Sep 4 21:50:57 2012: is_closing_session(): no DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS in environment
 ERROR: apport (pid 8853) Tue Sep 4 21:51:11 2012: wrote report /var/crash/_usr_share_apport_apport-gtk.0.crash
ApportVersion: 2.5.1-0ubuntu4
Architecture: amd64
Date: Tue Sep 4 21:50:57 2012
ExecutablePath: /usr/share/apport/apport-gtk
InterpreterPath: /usr/bin/python3.2mu
PackageArchitecture: all
ProcCmdline: /usr/bin/python3 /usr/share/apport/apport-gtk
ProcEnviron:
 PATH=(custom, no user)
 LANG=en_US.UTF-8
 SHELL=/bin/bash
 TERM=unknown
Signal: 6
SourcePackage: apport
StacktraceTop:
 raise () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 abort () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 ?? () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 __assert_fail () from /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6
 ?? () from /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6
Title: apport-gtk crashed with SIGABRT in raise()
UpgradeStatus: No upgrade log present (probably fresh install)
UserGroups:

Revision history for this message
Roman Stingler (coolx67) wrote :
Revision history for this message
Apport retracing service (apport) wrote : This bug is a duplicate

Thank you for taking the time to report this crash and helping to make this software better. This particular crash has already been reported and is a duplicate of bug #1024202, so is being marked as such. Please look at the other bug report to see if there is any missing information that you can provide, or to see if there is a workaround for the bug. Additionally, any further discussion regarding the bug should occur in the other report. Please continue to report any other bugs you may find.

visibility: private → public
tags: removed: need-amd64-retrace
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.