SRU: no-change rebuild to pick up changed build flags on ppc64el and s390x

Bug #2083480 reported by Matthias Klose
10
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
acl (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Noble
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
apache2 (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Noble
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
attr (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Noble
Fix Committed
Undecided
Unassigned
audit (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Noble
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
bind9 (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
boost1.83 (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Noble
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
ceph (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
chrony (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Noble
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
e2fsprogs (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
eigen3 (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Noble
Fix Committed
Undecided
Unassigned
elfutils (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Noble
Fix Committed
Undecided
Unassigned
expat (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
gmp (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Noble
Fix Committed
Undecided
Unassigned
haproxy (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Noble
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
isc-kea (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Noble
Fix Committed
Undecided
Unassigned
isl (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Noble
Fix Committed
Undecided
Unassigned
kmod (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Noble
Fix Committed
Undecided
Unassigned
krb5 (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Noble
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
libaio (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Noble
Fix Committed
Undecided
Unassigned
libbsd (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Noble
Fix Committed
Undecided
Unassigned
libcap2 (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Noble
Fix Committed
Undecided
Unassigned
libgpg-error (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Noble
Fix Committed
Undecided
Unassigned
libidn2 (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Noble
Fix Committed
Undecided
Unassigned
libmd (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Noble
Fix Committed
Undecided
Unassigned
libnl3 (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Noble
Fix Committed
Undecided
Unassigned
libselinux (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Noble
Fix Committed
Undecided
Unassigned
libunistring (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Noble
Fix Committed
Undecided
Unassigned
libunwind (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Noble
Fix Committed
Undecided
Unassigned
libvirt (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
libzpc (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Noble
Fix Committed
Undecided
Unassigned
mpclib3 (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Noble
Fix Committed
Undecided
Unassigned
mpfr4 (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Noble
Fix Committed
Undecided
Unassigned
nfs-utils (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Noble
Fix Committed
Undecided
Unassigned
nghttp2 (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Noble
Fix Committed
Undecided
Unassigned
openjdk-21 (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
openldap (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Noble
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
openvswitch (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Noble
Fix Committed
Undecided
Unassigned
pcre2 (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Noble
Fix Committed
Undecided
Unassigned
perl (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Noble
Fix Committed
Undecided
Unassigned
php8.3 (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu)
Invalid
Undecided
Unassigned
ruby3.2 (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Noble
Fix Released
Undecided
Unassigned
sqlite3 (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Noble
Fix Committed
Undecided
Unassigned
vsftpd (Ubuntu)
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Noble
Fix Committed
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

SRU: no-change rebuild to pick up changed build flags on ppc64el and s390x

This is batch of packages that we want to rebuild to pick up the changed build flags on ppc64el (LP: #2064539) and s390x (LP: #2064538).

Impact: These are no change uploads on architectures other than ppc64el and s390x. All of those packages already built successful in oracular with the changed build flags.

We will validate picking up the changed build flags by inspecting the log files on ppc64el and s390x.

The packages are now all built, and passing autopkg tests (the failing software-properties test is unrelated).

Packages already rebuilt in noble-updates:
  e2fsprogs expat libvirt php8.3 rabbitmq-server

Packages, that are not yet ready:

Frank Heimes (fheimes)
tags: added: ppc64el s390x
Matthias Klose (doko)
description: updated
Changed in e2fsprogs (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Changed in expat (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Changed in libvirt (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Changed in php8.3 (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Revision history for this message
Matthias Klose (doko) wrote :

openjdk-21 will be addressed with the 2024.10 security updates

Changed in rabbitmq-server (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Changed in openjdk-21 (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Revision history for this message
Mauricio Faria de Oliveira (mfo) wrote :

Rejected Noble's ceph SRU for this [1] as it is based on RC2, and a concurrent upload with a newer/Release version existed and has been accepted (bug 2081781), thus should address this too.

[1]
Version: 19.2.0~rc2-0ubuntu0.24.04.2
Distribution: noble
Urgency: medium
Maintainer: Ubuntu Developers <email address hidden>
Changed-By: Matthias Klose <email address hidden>
Changes:
 ceph (19.2.0~rc2-0ubuntu0.24.04.2) noble; urgency=medium
 .
   * SRU: #2083480: No-change rebuild to disable frame pointers on
     ppc64el and s390x.

Revision history for this message
Matthias Klose (doko) wrote :

ceph already uploaded. we need the boost1.83 rebuild to promote the one boost binary package

Changed in ceph (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Revision history for this message
Matthias Klose (doko) wrote :

bind9 uploaded 2024-10-04

Changed in bind9 (Ubuntu):
status: New → Invalid
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote : Please test proposed package

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted acl into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/acl/2.3.2-1build1.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in acl (Ubuntu Noble):
status: New → Fix Committed
tags: added: verification-needed verification-needed-noble
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted apache2 into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/apache2/2.4.58-1ubuntu8.5 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in apache2 (Ubuntu Noble):
status: New → Fix Committed
Changed in attr (Ubuntu Noble):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted attr into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/attr/1:2.5.2-1build1.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in audit (Ubuntu Noble):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted audit into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/audit/1:3.1.2-2.1build1.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted boost1.83 into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/boost1.83/1.83.0-2.1ubuntu3.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in boost1.83 (Ubuntu Noble):
status: New → Fix Committed
Changed in chrony (Ubuntu Noble):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted chrony into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/chrony/4.5-1ubuntu4.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in eigen3 (Ubuntu Noble):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted eigen3 into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eigen3/3.4.0-4build0.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted elfutils into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/elfutils/0.190-1.1build4.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in elfutils (Ubuntu Noble):
status: New → Fix Committed
Changed in gmp (Ubuntu Noble):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted gmp into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/gmp/2:6.3.0+dfsg-2ubuntu6.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in haproxy (Ubuntu Noble):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted haproxy into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/haproxy/2.8.5-1ubuntu3.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted isc-kea into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isc-kea/2.4.1-3build3.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in isc-kea (Ubuntu Noble):
status: New → Fix Committed
Changed in isl (Ubuntu Noble):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted isl into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/isl/0.26-3build1.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in kmod (Ubuntu Noble):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted kmod into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/kmod/31+20240202-2ubuntu7.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in krb5 (Ubuntu Noble):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted krb5 into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/krb5/1.20.1-6ubuntu2.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted libaio into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libaio/0.3.113-6build1.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in libaio (Ubuntu Noble):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted libbsd into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libbsd/0.12.1-1build1.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in libbsd (Ubuntu Noble):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted libcap2 into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libcap2/1:2.66-5ubuntu2.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in libcap2 (Ubuntu Noble):
status: New → Fix Committed
Changed in libgpg-error (Ubuntu Noble):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted libgpg-error into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libgpg-error/1.47-3build2.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted libidn2 into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libidn2/2.3.7-2build1.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in libidn2 (Ubuntu Noble):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted libmd into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libmd/1.1.0-2build1.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in libmd (Ubuntu Noble):
status: New → Fix Committed
Changed in libnl3 (Ubuntu Noble):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted libnl3 into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libnl3/3.7.0-0.3build1.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted libselinux into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libselinux/3.5-2ubuntu2.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in libselinux (Ubuntu Noble):
status: New → Fix Committed
Changed in libunistring (Ubuntu Noble):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted libunistring into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libunistring/1.1-2build1.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in libunwind (Ubuntu Noble):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted libunwind into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libunwind/1.6.2-3build1.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in libzpc (Ubuntu Noble):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted libzpc into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libzpc/1.2.0-0ubuntu1.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in mpclib3 (Ubuntu Noble):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted mpclib3 into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mpclib3/1.3.1-1build1.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in mpfr4 (Ubuntu Noble):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted mpfr4 into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mpfr4/4.2.1-1build1.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in nfs-utils (Ubuntu Noble):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nfs-utils into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nfs-utils/1:2.6.4-3ubuntu5.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in nghttp2 (Ubuntu Noble):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted nghttp2 into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nghttp2/1.59.0-1ubuntu0.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted openldap into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openldap/2.6.7+dfsg-1~exp1ubuntu8.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in openldap (Ubuntu Noble):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted openvswitch into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openvswitch/3.3.0-1ubuntu3.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in openvswitch (Ubuntu Noble):
status: New → Fix Committed
Changed in pcre2 (Ubuntu Noble):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted pcre2 into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/pcre2/10.42-4ubuntu2.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in perl (Ubuntu Noble):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted perl into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/perl/5.38.2-3.2build2.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in ruby3.2 (Ubuntu Noble):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted ruby3.2 into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby3.2/3.2.3-1ubuntu0.24.04.2 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted sqlite3 into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/sqlite3/3.45.1-1ubuntu2.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Changed in sqlite3 (Ubuntu Noble):
status: New → Fix Committed
Changed in vsftpd (Ubuntu Noble):
status: New → Fix Committed
Revision history for this message
Łukasz Zemczak (sil2100) wrote :

Hello Matthias, or anyone else affected,

Accepted vsftpd into noble-proposed. The package will build now and be available at https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/vsftpd/3.0.5-0ubuntu3.1 in a few hours, and then in the -proposed repository.

Please help us by testing this new package. See https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Testing/EnableProposed for documentation on how to enable and use -proposed. Your feedback will aid us getting this update out to other Ubuntu users.

If this package fixes the bug for you, please add a comment to this bug, mentioning the version of the package you tested, what testing has been performed on the package and change the tag from verification-needed-noble to verification-done-noble. If it does not fix the bug for you, please add a comment stating that, and change the tag to verification-failed-noble. In either case, without details of your testing we will not be able to proceed.

Further information regarding the verification process can be found at https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/PerformingSRUVerification . Thank you in advance for helping!

N.B. The updated package will be released to -updates after the bug(s) fixed by this package have been verified and the package has been in -proposed for a minimum of 7 days.

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (libunwind/1.6.2-3build1.1)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted libunwind (1.6.2-3build1.1) for noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

linux-gke/6.8.0-1013.17 (amd64)
linux-lowlatency/6.8.0-45.45.1 (amd64)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/noble/update_excuses.html#libunwind

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (ruby3.2/3.2.3-1ubuntu0.24.04.2)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted ruby3.2 (3.2.3-1ubuntu0.24.04.2) for noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

ruby-concurrent/1.2.3-2build1 (amd64)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/noble/update_excuses.html#ruby3.2

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (eigen3/3.4.0-4build0.1)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted eigen3 (3.4.0-4build0.1) for noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

nanobind/unknown (ppc64el)
pybind11/unknown (ppc64el)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/noble/update_excuses.html#eigen3

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (haproxy/2.8.5-1ubuntu3.1)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted haproxy (2.8.5-1ubuntu3.1) for noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

hatop/unknown (armhf)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/noble/update_excuses.html#haproxy

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (krb5/1.20.1-6ubuntu2.2)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted krb5 (1.20.1-6ubuntu2.2) for noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

gssproxy/0.9.2-2build2 (s390x)
libsoup3/3.4.4-5build2 (s390x)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/noble/update_excuses.html#krb5

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (libmd/1.1.0-2build1.1)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted libmd (1.1.0-2build1.1) for noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

cruft-ng/unknown (armhf)
donkey/unknown (armhf)
libbsd/unknown (armhf)
libmd/unknown (armhf)
systemd-cron/unknown (armhf)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/noble/update_excuses.html#libmd

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (libunistring/1.1-2build1.1)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted libunistring (1.1-2build1.1) for noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

boxes/unknown (armhf)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/noble/update_excuses.html#libunistring

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (vsftpd/3.0.5-0ubuntu3.1)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted vsftpd (3.0.5-0ubuntu3.1) for noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

pycurl/unknown (armhf)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/noble/update_excuses.html#vsftpd

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (acl/2.3.2-1build1.1)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted acl (2.3.2-1build1.1) for noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

stress-ng/0.17.06-1build1 (arm64)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/noble/update_excuses.html#acl

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (sqlite3/3.45.1-1ubuntu2.1)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted sqlite3 (3.45.1-1ubuntu2.1) for noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

libsoup3/3.4.4-5build2 (amd64)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/noble/update_excuses.html#sqlite3

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (isc-kea/2.4.1-3build3.1)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted isc-kea (2.4.1-3build3.1) for noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

isc-kea/unknown (armhf)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/noble/update_excuses.html#isc-kea

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (libnl3/3.7.0-0.3build1.1)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted libnl3 (3.7.0-0.3build1.1) for noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

jool/unknown (armhf)
libvirt/unknown (armhf)
openmpi/unknown (armhf)
wireshark/4.2.2-1.1build3 (ppc64el)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/noble/update_excuses.html#libnl3

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (openldap/2.6.7+dfsg-1~exp1ubuntu8.1)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted openldap (2.6.7+dfsg-1~exp1ubuntu8.1) for noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

389-ds-base/unknown (armhf)
apache2/unknown (armhf)
bind9/unknown (armhf)
curl/unknown (armhf)
django-auth-ldap/unknown (armhf)
dovecot/1:2.3.21+dfsg1-2ubuntu6 (s390x)
dovecot/unknown (armhf)
evolution-data-server/unknown (armhf)
exim4/unknown (armhf)
freeradius/unknown (armhf)
glewlwyd/unknown (armhf)
libreoffice/unknown (armhf, ppc64el)
libreswan/unknown (armhf)
lighttpd/unknown (armhf)
php-net-ldap2/unknown (armhf)
php8.3/unknown (armhf)
python-bonsai/1.5.0+ds-3build3 (s390x)
python-ldap/unknown (armhf)
samba/unknown (armhf)
strongswan/unknown (armhf)
sudo/unknown (armhf)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/noble/update_excuses.html#openldap

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (mpfr4/4.2.1-1build1.1)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted mpfr4 (4.2.1-1build1.1) for noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

flint/unknown (armhf)
fpylll/unknown (armhf)
gcc-10/10.5.0-4ubuntu2 (ppc64el)
gcc-11/11.4.0-9ubuntu1 (ppc64el)
gcc-12/12.3.0-17ubuntu1 (ppc64el)
gcc-12/unknown (armhf)
gcc-13/unknown (armhf)
gcc-9/unknown (armhf)
gcc-arm-none-eabi/unknown (armhf)
gcc-bpf/unknown (armhf)
gcc-sh-elf/unknown (armhf)
gcc-snapshot/unknown (armhf)
ghdl/unknown (ppc64el)
libmath-mpfr-perl/unknown (armhf)
mpfi/unknown (armhf)
mshr/unknown (armhf)
octave-interval/unknown (armhf)
pygalmesh/unknown (armhf)
snd/unknown (armhf)
stress-ng/unknown (armhf)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/noble/update_excuses.html#mpfr4

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

I checked the build logs of boost1.83 on ppc64el and s390x and compared 1.83.0-2.1ubuntu3 with 1.83.0-2.1ubuntu3.1:

1.83.0-2.1ubuntu3: -fno-omit-frame-pointer seen
1.83.0-2.1ubuntu3.1: that flag was not present

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (apache2/2.4.58-1ubuntu8.5)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted apache2 (2.4.58-1ubuntu8.5) for noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

nagios-plugins-contrib/45.20231212ubuntu2 (arm64, ppc64el, s390x)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/noble/update_excuses.html#apache2

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (elfutils/0.190-1.1build4.1)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted elfutils (0.190-1.1build4.1) for noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

linux-gke/6.8.0-1013.17 (amd64)
linux-lowlatency/6.8.0-47.47.1 (amd64, arm64)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/noble/update_excuses.html#elfutils

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (libidn2/2.3.7-2build1.1)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted libidn2 (2.3.7-2build1.1) for noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

curl/unknown (ppc64el)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/noble/update_excuses.html#libidn2

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (audit/1:3.1.2-2.1build1.1)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted audit (1:3.1.2-2.1build1.1) for noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

gdm3/unknown (ppc64el)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/noble/update_excuses.html#audit

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (libcap2/1:2.66-5ubuntu2.1)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted libcap2 (1:2.66-5ubuntu2.1) for noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

linux-gke/6.8.0-1013.17 (amd64)
linux-lowlatency/6.8.0-47.47.1 (amd64, arm64)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/noble/update_excuses.html#libcap2

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Ubuntu SRU Bot (ubuntu-sru-bot) wrote : Autopkgtest regression report (perl/5.38.2-3.2build2.1)

All autopkgtests for the newly accepted perl (5.38.2-3.2build2.1) for noble have finished running.
The following regressions have been reported in tests triggered by the package:

libbio-procedural-perl/unknown (ppc64el)
libextutils-cppguess-perl/unknown (ppc64el)
libobject-extend-perl/unknown (ppc64el)
lintian/unknown (s390x)
ubuntu-dev-tools/0.201ubuntu2 (i386)

Please visit the excuses page listed below and investigate the failures, proceeding afterwards as per the StableReleaseUpdates policy regarding autopkgtest regressions [1].

https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/proposed-migration/noble/update_excuses.html#perl

[1] https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates#Autopkgtest_Regressions

Thank you!

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package ruby3.2 - 3.2.3-1ubuntu0.24.04.3

---------------
ruby3.2 (3.2.3-1ubuntu0.24.04.3) noble-security; urgency=medium

  * SECURITY UPDATE: denial of service in REXML
    - debian/patches/CVE-2024-35176_39908_41123.patch: Read quoted
      attributes in chunks
    - debian/patches/CVE-2024-41946.patch: Add support for XML entity
      expansion limitation in SAX and pull parsers
    - debian/patches/CVE-2024-49761.patch: fix a bug that &#0x...; is
      accepted as a character reference
    - CVE-2024-35176
    - CVE-2024-39908
    - CVE-2024-41123
    - CVE-2024-41946
    - CVE-2024-49761

 -- Nishit Majithia <email address hidden> Fri, 25 Oct 2024 14:06:35 +0530

Changed in ruby3.2 (Ubuntu Noble):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote (last edit ):

There are many packages here. To facilitate the verification, this is the recipe:
- autopkgtests green
- on ppc64el/s390x build logs, we want -fno-omit-frame-pointer to be ABSENT
- on all other 64bit architecture build logs, we want -fno-omit-frame-pointer to be PRESENT

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package acl - 2.3.2-1build1.1

---------------
acl (2.3.2-1build1.1) noble; urgency=medium

  * SRU: LP: #2083480: No-change rebuild to disable frame pointers on
    ppc64el and s390x.

 -- Matthias Klose <email address hidden> Wed, 02 Oct 2024 14:40:51 +0200

Changed in acl (Ubuntu Noble):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

I verified acl 2.3.2-1build1.1 from noble proposed according to comment #63.

Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

I verified apache2 2.4.58-1ubuntu8.5 from noble proposed according to comment #63.

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package apache2 - 2.4.58-1ubuntu8.5

---------------
apache2 (2.4.58-1ubuntu8.5) noble; urgency=medium

  * SRU: LP: #2083480: No-change rebuild to disable frame pointers on
    ppc64el and s390x.

 -- Matthias Klose <email address hidden> Wed, 02 Oct 2024 14:40:51 +0200

Changed in apache2 (Ubuntu Noble):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package audit - 1:3.1.2-2.1build1.1

---------------
audit (1:3.1.2-2.1build1.1) noble; urgency=medium

  * SRU: LP: #2083480: No-change rebuild to disable frame pointers on
    ppc64el and s390x.

 -- Matthias Klose <email address hidden> Wed, 02 Oct 2024 14:40:50 +0200

Changed in audit (Ubuntu Noble):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Andreas Hasenack (ahasenack) wrote :

(I'm starting to get timeouts when adding comments to this bug, so I'll stop with the verification ones. Please assume that I performed the verification as stated in comment #63 and I release a package here).

I verified audit 1:3.1.2-2.1build1.1 from noble proposed according to comment #63.

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package boost1.83 - 1.83.0-2.1ubuntu3.1

---------------
boost1.83 (1.83.0-2.1ubuntu3.1) noble; urgency=medium

  * SRU: LP: #2083480: No-change rebuild to disable frame pointers on
    ppc64el and s390x.

 -- Matthias Klose <email address hidden> Wed, 02 Oct 2024 14:40:51 +0200

Changed in boost1.83 (Ubuntu Noble):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package chrony - 4.5-1ubuntu4.2

---------------
chrony (4.5-1ubuntu4.2) noble; urgency=medium

  * SRU: LP: #2083480: No-change rebuild to disable frame pointers on
    ppc64el and s390x.

 -- Matthias Klose <email address hidden> Wed, 02 Oct 2024 14:40:49 +0200

Changed in chrony (Ubuntu Noble):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package krb5 - 1.20.1-6ubuntu2.2

---------------
krb5 (1.20.1-6ubuntu2.2) noble; urgency=medium

  * SRU: LP: #2083480: No-change rebuild to disable frame pointers on
    ppc64el and s390x.

 -- Matthias Klose <email address hidden> Wed, 02 Oct 2024 14:40:50 +0200

Changed in krb5 (Ubuntu Noble):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package openldap - 2.6.7+dfsg-1~exp1ubuntu8.1

---------------
openldap (2.6.7+dfsg-1~exp1ubuntu8.1) noble; urgency=medium

  * SRU: LP: #2083480: No-change rebuild to disable frame pointers on
    ppc64el and s390x.

 -- Matthias Klose <email address hidden> Wed, 02 Oct 2024 14:40:51 +0200

Changed in openldap (Ubuntu Noble):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

This bug was fixed in the package haproxy - 2.8.5-1ubuntu3.1

---------------
haproxy (2.8.5-1ubuntu3.1) noble; urgency=medium

  * SRU: LP: #2083480: No-change rebuild to disable frame pointers on
    ppc64el and s390x.

 -- Matthias Klose <email address hidden> Wed, 02 Oct 2024 14:40:51 +0200

Changed in haproxy (Ubuntu Noble):
status: Fix Committed → Fix Released
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.