various packaging issues
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
389-admin (Ubuntu) |
Fix Released
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
The source is not lintian clean:
W: 389-admin source: package-
W: 389-admin source: build-depends-
W: 389-admin source: syntax-
W: 389-admin source: out-of-
The patches in debian/patches/* do not have DEP-3 comments:
Patch tagging:
fix-linking.patch:
FAIL: neither 'Description' or 'Subject' tagged in patch
FAIL: Neither 'Origin', 'Author', or 'From' tagged in patch
(see http://
format-
FAIL: neither 'Description' or 'Subject' tagged in patch
FAIL: Neither 'Origin', 'Author', or 'From' tagged in patch
(see http://
http_conf_fix:
FAIL: neither 'Description' or 'Subject' tagged in patch
FAIL: Neither 'Origin', 'Author', or 'From' tagged in patch
(see http://
man_page_fixes:
FAIL: neither 'Description' or 'Subject' tagged in patch
FAIL: Neither 'Origin', 'Author', or 'From' tagged in patch
(see http://
remove_softtokn3:
FAIL: neither 'Description' or 'Subject' tagged in patch
FAIL: Neither 'Origin', 'Author', or 'From' tagged in patch
(see http://
speling_fixes:
FAIL: neither 'Description' or 'Subject' tagged in patch
FAIL: Neither 'Origin', 'Author', or 'From' tagged in patch
(see http://
README.Debian contains lines longer than 80 characters.
yeah, I've forgot to run lintian on the source packages, whoops (sbuild only checks the binaries)
DEP-3 headers; didn't know they were "strongly encouraged".. will fix those too.