[needs-packaging] jHeidi

Bug #292487 reported by Fred
2
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Ubuntu
Confirmed
Wishlist
Unassigned

Bug Description

jHeidi is a free, open source client for MySQL

License: public domain

http://www.heidisql.com/jheidi/

freshinstall (mailroom)
description: updated
description: updated
Revision history for this message
Fred (eldmannen+launchpad) wrote :

Someone changed the license from "GNU General Public License" to "freeware".

HeidiSQL is under the GPL. So I was under the impression that jHeidi was so too. I am not sure if that is the case.

If jHeidi is not FOSS, then I would like to retract this request.

Revision history for this message
freshinstall (mailroom) wrote :

I am the creator of jHeidi and I corrected the "license". I have no interest in any kind of license for my code.
Why it should matter to someone who has no stake in my project is bizarre.
I appreciate the offer of packaging however, jHeidi runs nicely by unzipping and executing a shell script.

thx

Revision history for this message
Fred (eldmannen+launchpad) wrote :

So you mean that jHeidi is license-free software?
* http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/License-free_software

What freedoms do I have?

* Freedom 0: The freedom to run the program for any purpose.
* Freedom 1: The freedom to study and modify the program.
* Freedom 2: The freedom to copy the program so you can help your neighbor.
* Freedom 3: The freedom to improve the program, and release your improvements to the public, so that the whole community benefits.

Ubuntu only allows free open source software.
Are there any restrictions in your software?

You might want to put jHeidi under a license like BSD, MIT or ISC licence. Or you could put it in the public domain if you don't like licenses.

Revision history for this message
freshinstall (mailroom) wrote :

Absolutely, the project is in the public domain. There are no restrictions.
I should have explained that in my response.

Revision history for this message
Fred (eldmannen+launchpad) wrote :

Then it would be more apprioprate to change License to 'public domain' instead of 'freeware'.

Freeware are usually proprietary closed-source software with restrictions that prevent you from modifying, disassembling, decompiling, etc.

Also, it would be good if you put on the website, that it is public domain. Because, now it is rather confusing..

description: updated
Revision history for this message
freshinstall (mailroom) wrote :

Will do. Sorry for the confusion.

Revision history for this message
Brian Murray (brian-murray) wrote :

*** This is an automated message ***

This bug is tagged needs-packaging which identifies it as a request for a new package in Ubuntu. As a part of the managing needs-packaging bug reports specification, https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QATeam/Specs/NeedsPackagingBugs, all needs-packaging bug reports have Wishlist importance. Subsequently, I'm setting this bug's status to Wishlist.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.