Failed to update packages: GPG Error with BADSIG as returned message

Bug #1355430 reported by Tobias Dausend
28
This bug affects 6 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
elementary OS
New
Undecided
Unassigned
Ubuntu
Confirmed
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

Today I've tried to update my Ubuntu 12.04 and got the following message in return:

W: GPG error: http://de.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 40976EAF437D05B5 Ubuntu Archive Automatic Signing Key <email address hidden>

I've tried also my both installations with elementaryOS and got this error message again.

Revision history for this message
Tobias Dausend (b-infj-j) wrote :

Additional information: There was no change within packages for the last days and the last updates on the weekend were without problems done.

Revision history for this message
Anton Frick (anton-frick) wrote :

Had the same problem yesterday.

W: GPG error: http://de.archive.ubuntu.com trusty-updates Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 40976EAF437D05B5 Ubuntu Archive Automatic Signing Key <email address hidden>

An hour later the trusty-updates Release.gpg was updated according to the ftp's file timestamp and everything seemed to work properly again.

Revision history for this message
Launchpad Janitor (janitor) wrote :

Status changed to 'Confirmed' because the bug affects multiple users.

Changed in ubuntu:
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Alexey Degtyarev (adegtyarev) wrote :

The same here on Trusty:

# apt-get update
...
...
Fetched 297 kB in 2s (111 kB/s)
W: GPG error: http://de.archive.ubuntu.com trusty-backports Release: The following signatures were invalid: BADSIG 40976EAF437D05B5 Ubuntu Archive Automatic Signing Key <email address hidden>
W: Failed to fetch bzip2:/var/lib/apt/lists/partial/de.archive.ubuntu.com_ubuntu_dists_trusty-updates_main_binary-amd64_Packages Hash Sum mismatch

E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead.
# echo $?
100

Revision history for this message
nh2 (nh2) wrote :

Is this an error only with the .de mirror? It is still there.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.