Comment 20 for bug 1065281

Based on Colin's comments, the latest crash (although it looks the same) most likely isn't identical since we are now seeing some additional messages logged prior to the crash that we didn't see before (sdb is the 4k sector disk in question):

Jan 18 17:07:30 kernel: [ 354.999903] FAT-fs (sdb1): logical sector size too small for device (logical sector size = 512)
Jan 18 17:07:30 kernel: [ 355.000367] isofs_fill_super: bread failed, dev=sdb1, iso_blknum=17, block=-2147483648
Jan 18 17:07:30 kernel: [ 355.015595] isofs_fill_super: bread failed, dev=sdb2, iso_blknum=17, block=-2147483648
Jan 18 17:07:30 kernel: [ 355.030905] isofs_fill_super: bread failed, dev=sdb3, iso_blknum=17, block=-2147483648
Jan 18 17:07:30 kernel: [ 355.072466] FAT-fs (sdb1): logical sector size too small for device (logical sector size = 512)
Jan 18 17:07:30 kernel: [ 355.072966] isofs_fill_super: bread failed, dev=sdb1, iso_blknum=17, block=-2147483648
Jan 18 17:07:30 kernel: [ 355.088324] isofs_fill_super: bread failed, dev=sdb2, iso_blknum=17, block=-2147483648
Jan 18 17:07:30 kernel: [ 355.102969] isofs_fill_super: bread failed, dev=sdb3, iso_blknum=17, block=-2147483648
Jan 18 17:07:35 kernel: [ 360.214278] Adding 134059004k swap on /dev/sdb3. Priority:-1 extents:1 across:134059004k