Comment 161 for bug 435352

Revision history for this message
Catscrash (catscrash) wrote :

why did i compile 600... that was stupid
@knuutsen i don't find a new statement in your post, did i miss something or is the following the state of the moment?

udelay(2000) - works (> 2 people)
udelay(1000) - works (knuutsen, catscrash)
udelay(600) - works (catcrash)
udelay(500) - works (deChrLam with method see # 148, stephan d.)
udelay(400)- breaks (knuutsen with method # 148)
udelay(350) - breaks (knuutsen with method # 148)
udelay(300) - breaks (catscrash)
udelay(250) - breaks (stephan d.)
udelay(100) - breaks (catscrash, stephan d.)
udelay(50) - breaks (stephan d., jbob)
udelay(48) - breaks (knuutsen)