Testcase 1302: order of test steps does not correspond to installation manager order

[gerry_the_hat]

- Nr. 18 should be nr. 3
- nr 7 + 8 -> I was at no time asked about that
- nr 14 should be nr 5
- nr. 19 -> I was no choise given, delete this nr.
- nr 21 -> I was at no time asked about that

Well, the general idea of this test case is still clear, but just does not reflect the order and / or options the installation managers offers.

[Kev Bowring (flocculant)]

I'm guessing this is an installer testcase - there are a lot of different ones - if you go to the testcase you followed, then click detailed information you'll see the ID. Add that to the bug and we can move on.

[gerry_the_hat (gerry-the-hat)]

Oh, I'm sorry. Just clicked the link "Report a bug against this test case". Thought this is enough. Anyway, ID is 1302.

[Simon Quigley (tsimonq2)]

While attempting to fix this bug, I've noticed that it's flavor dependent on how this works. Some boot to a menu that asks if you want to boot the flavor without installing it, but others do what's described. I'll find a flavor that does the latter, but am I okay to write a separate test case for the flavors that don't do that right away?

[Kev Bowring (flocculant)]

Perhaps rather than a seperate testcase maybe do something

<em>if FAMILY boots to a menu, do this ...
<em>if FAMILY boots to desktop, do this ...

[Simon Quigley (tsimonq2)]

Oh, I see, I'll do that.

[Simon Quigley (tsimonq2)]

@flocculant there's more than one step where the flavors differ on that, don't you think it would be confusing to have a lot of "if this do this, otherwise do that" if booting to the menu is the most common? For example, Kubuntu has different instructions. I think it would be better to do separate after looking at it. The different flavors are a minority.

[Kev Bowring (flocculant)]

If it's that bad then go for it.

But - bear in mind that we might end up with a bunch of testcases floating around unused - having them available in the branch doesn't mean they get to a tracker