Re-approval, ubuntu-qc

[Christophe Sauthier]

LP Link: http://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-qc

Re-approval task bug.
This bug will be used to track the progress of the re-approval,
and make sure that every team gets the needed follow-through.
This bug will also allow us to keep a record of who was approved
and re-approved when. Please keep in mind the only people who should
be subscribed are the LoCo Council, and the team Contact. This bug will
also be kept private, for council use.

Your cooperation is thanked kindly in advance,
The Ubuntu LoCo Council

[Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre (cyphermox)]

Oops, we seem to have dropped the ball on this.

Quite honestly, with the handover I'm having a hard time seeing that we have sufficient activity to support a claim for being an approved LoCo team. There *is* activity, but currently (and that's what I am to fix), a distinct lack of tracking of the activities, there hasn't been a monthly report ever, and no meetings to speak of (though I'd argue we hardly need that).

Mailing list is pretty active, and the channel has a consistent membership of at least 14, with a few people coming and going. I'll have to check for the subscription numbers for mailing list and the LP team.

What is the current expected procedure for handling this particular case? I do think we *should* be an approved team, though I do think it will need more work to back that claim and for it to be sustainable. Should we go through a full new approval process or go through the renewal despite it being from November?

[Laura Czajkowski (czajkowski)]

At least you're being honest with us. IF this is the case what I'd suggest is the following, let the team expire out, When the team is ready and has documented its work re apply for re approval when you're ready. You'll just go through the normal process of re approval and following -https://wiki.ubuntu.com/LoCoCouncil/TeamApprovalGuidelines

[Sergio Meneses (sergiomeneses)]

Reapproval Application:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/QuebecTeam/ReApprovalApplication2012