2020-10-16 05:20:34 |
Po-Hsu Lin |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
2020-10-16 05:21:49 |
Po-Hsu Lin |
bug task added |
|
linux (Ubuntu) |
|
2020-10-16 05:30:08 |
Ubuntu Kernel Bot |
linux (Ubuntu): status |
New |
Incomplete |
|
2020-10-16 05:34:05 |
Po-Hsu Lin |
tags |
|
ubuntu-kernel-selftests |
|
2020-10-16 05:34:06 |
Po-Hsu Lin |
description |
== SRU Justification ==
The test output in psock_snd.sh is confusing sometimes. Here is an output example:
raw csum_off with bad offset (fails)
./psock_snd: write: Invalid argument
The first line is the test case description, and the second is the test execution output.
It feels like this test has failed, but it has passed instead.
The "fails" here means this test is expected to fail. But you will have to check the source code to know this fact.
== Fix ==
* 30ae801746ea selftests/net: improve descriptions for XFAIL cases in psock_snd.sh
Change "fails" in the test case description to "expected to fail", so
that the test output can be more understandable.
== Regression Potential ==
Low, minor changes for test case description only. |
== SRU Justification ==
The test output in psock_snd.sh is confusing sometimes.
Here is an output example:
raw csum_off with bad offset (fails)
./psock_snd: write: Invalid argument
The first line is the test case description, and the second is the
test execution output.
It feels like this test has failed, but it has passed instead.
The "fails" here means this test is expected to fail. But you will
have to check the source code to know this fact.
== Fix ==
* 30ae801746ea selftests/net: improve descriptions for XFAIL cases in
psock_snd.sh
Change "fails" in the test case description to "expected to fail", so
that the test output can be more understandable.
== Test ==
Patch tested by applying to the tree directly, the test description
will be changed as expected.
== Regression Potential ==
Low, minor changes for test case description only. |
|
2020-10-16 05:34:38 |
Po-Hsu Lin |
nominated for series |
|
Ubuntu Groovy |
|
2020-10-16 05:34:38 |
Po-Hsu Lin |
bug task added |
|
linux (Ubuntu Groovy) |
|
2020-10-16 05:34:38 |
Po-Hsu Lin |
nominated for series |
|
Ubuntu Focal |
|
2020-10-16 05:34:38 |
Po-Hsu Lin |
bug task added |
|
linux (Ubuntu Focal) |
|
2020-10-16 05:37:47 |
Po-Hsu Lin |
description |
== SRU Justification ==
The test output in psock_snd.sh is confusing sometimes.
Here is an output example:
raw csum_off with bad offset (fails)
./psock_snd: write: Invalid argument
The first line is the test case description, and the second is the
test execution output.
It feels like this test has failed, but it has passed instead.
The "fails" here means this test is expected to fail. But you will
have to check the source code to know this fact.
== Fix ==
* 30ae801746ea selftests/net: improve descriptions for XFAIL cases in
psock_snd.sh
Change "fails" in the test case description to "expected to fail", so
that the test output can be more understandable.
== Test ==
Patch tested by applying to the tree directly, the test description
will be changed as expected.
== Regression Potential ==
Low, minor changes for test case description only. |
== SRU Justification ==
The test output in psock_snd.sh is confusing sometimes. Here is an output example:
raw csum_off with bad offset (fails)
./psock_snd: write: Invalid argument
The first line is the test case description, and the second is the test execution output.
It feels like this test has failed, but it has passed instead.
The "fails" here means this test is expected to fail. But you will have to check the source code to know this fact.
== Fix ==
* 30ae801746ea selftests/net: improve descriptions for XFAIL cases in psock_snd.sh
Change "fails" in the test case description to "expected to fail", so
that the test output can be more understandable.
This test case exists only after Bionic, and it can be cherry-picked.
== Regression Potential ==
Low, minor changes for test case description only. |
|
2020-10-16 05:38:02 |
Po-Hsu Lin |
description |
== SRU Justification ==
The test output in psock_snd.sh is confusing sometimes. Here is an output example:
raw csum_off with bad offset (fails)
./psock_snd: write: Invalid argument
The first line is the test case description, and the second is the test execution output.
It feels like this test has failed, but it has passed instead.
The "fails" here means this test is expected to fail. But you will have to check the source code to know this fact.
== Fix ==
* 30ae801746ea selftests/net: improve descriptions for XFAIL cases in psock_snd.sh
Change "fails" in the test case description to "expected to fail", so
that the test output can be more understandable.
This test case exists only after Bionic, and it can be cherry-picked.
== Regression Potential ==
Low, minor changes for test case description only. |
== SRU Justification ==
The test output in psock_snd.sh is confusing sometimes. Here is an output example:
raw csum_off with bad offset (fails)
./psock_snd: write: Invalid argument
The first line is the test case description, and the second is the test execution output.
It feels like this test has failed, but it has passed instead.
The "fails" here means this test is expected to fail. But you will have to check the source code to know this fact.
== Fix ==
* 30ae801746ea selftests/net: improve descriptions for XFAIL cases in psock_snd.sh
Change "fails" in the test case description to "expected to fail", so
that the test output can be more understandable.
This test case exists since Bionic, and it can be cherry-picked.
== Regression Potential ==
Low, minor changes for test case description only. |
|
2020-10-16 07:11:19 |
Po-Hsu Lin |
description |
== SRU Justification ==
The test output in psock_snd.sh is confusing sometimes. Here is an output example:
raw csum_off with bad offset (fails)
./psock_snd: write: Invalid argument
The first line is the test case description, and the second is the test execution output.
It feels like this test has failed, but it has passed instead.
The "fails" here means this test is expected to fail. But you will have to check the source code to know this fact.
== Fix ==
* 30ae801746ea selftests/net: improve descriptions for XFAIL cases in psock_snd.sh
Change "fails" in the test case description to "expected to fail", so
that the test output can be more understandable.
This test case exists since Bionic, and it can be cherry-picked.
== Regression Potential ==
Low, minor changes for test case description only. |
== SRU Justification ==
The test output in psock_snd.sh is confusing sometimes. Here is an output example:
raw csum_off with bad offset (fails)
./psock_snd: write: Invalid argument
The first line is the test case description, and the second is the test execution output.
It feels like this test has failed, but it has passed instead.
The "fails" here means this test is expected to fail. But you will have to check the source code to know this fact.
== Fix ==
* 30ae801746ea selftests/net: improve descriptions for XFAIL cases in psock_snd.sh
Change "fails" in the test case description to "expected to fail", so
that the test output can be more understandable.
This test case exists after Bionic, and it can be cherry-picked.
== Regression Potential ==
Low, minor changes for test case description only. |
|
2020-10-16 07:11:26 |
Po-Hsu Lin |
ubuntu-kernel-tests: assignee |
|
Po-Hsu Lin (cypressyew) |
|
2020-10-16 07:11:28 |
Po-Hsu Lin |
linux (Ubuntu Focal): assignee |
|
Po-Hsu Lin (cypressyew) |
|
2020-10-16 07:11:30 |
Po-Hsu Lin |
linux (Ubuntu Groovy): assignee |
|
Po-Hsu Lin (cypressyew) |
|
2020-10-16 07:11:33 |
Po-Hsu Lin |
linux (Ubuntu Focal): status |
New |
In Progress |
|
2020-10-16 07:11:36 |
Po-Hsu Lin |
linux (Ubuntu Groovy): status |
Incomplete |
In Progress |
|
2020-10-16 07:11:40 |
Po-Hsu Lin |
bug task added |
|
linux-oem-5.6 (Ubuntu) |
|
2020-10-16 07:11:50 |
Po-Hsu Lin |
linux-oem-5.6 (Ubuntu Groovy): status |
New |
Invalid |
|
2020-10-16 07:11:54 |
Po-Hsu Lin |
linux-oem-5.6 (Ubuntu Focal): status |
New |
In Progress |
|
2020-10-16 07:11:57 |
Po-Hsu Lin |
linux-oem-5.6 (Ubuntu Focal): assignee |
|
Po-Hsu Lin (cypressyew) |
|
2020-10-16 09:37:36 |
Timo Aaltonen |
linux-oem-5.6 (Ubuntu Focal): status |
In Progress |
Fix Committed |
|
2020-10-17 17:26:39 |
Ubuntu Kernel Bot |
tags |
ubuntu-kernel-selftests |
ubuntu-kernel-selftests verification-needed-focal |
|
2020-10-19 03:20:55 |
Po-Hsu Lin |
ubuntu-kernel-tests: status |
New |
In Progress |
|
2020-10-21 03:15:48 |
Po-Hsu Lin |
tags |
ubuntu-kernel-selftests verification-needed-focal |
ubuntu-kernel-selftests verification-done-focal |
|
2020-10-21 19:36:37 |
Launchpad Janitor |
linux-oem-5.6 (Ubuntu Focal): status |
Fix Committed |
Fix Released |
|
2020-10-21 19:36:37 |
Launchpad Janitor |
cve linked |
|
2020-12351 |
|
2020-10-21 19:36:37 |
Launchpad Janitor |
cve linked |
|
2020-12352 |
|
2020-10-21 19:36:37 |
Launchpad Janitor |
cve linked |
|
2020-24490 |
|
2020-10-22 18:05:20 |
Ian May |
linux (Ubuntu Focal): status |
In Progress |
Fix Committed |
|
2020-10-27 10:31:20 |
Kleber Sacilotto de Souza |
linux (Ubuntu Groovy): status |
In Progress |
Fix Committed |
|
2020-11-17 10:07:40 |
Ubuntu Kernel Bot |
tags |
ubuntu-kernel-selftests verification-done-focal |
ubuntu-kernel-selftests verification-done-focal verification-needed-groovy |
|
2020-11-27 09:52:53 |
Po-Hsu Lin |
tags |
ubuntu-kernel-selftests verification-done-focal verification-needed-groovy |
ubuntu-kernel-selftests verification-done-focal verification-done-groovy |
|
2020-11-27 09:52:58 |
Po-Hsu Lin |
ubuntu-kernel-tests: status |
In Progress |
Fix Released |
|
2020-11-27 09:53:24 |
Po-Hsu Lin |
linux (Ubuntu): status |
In Progress |
Fix Released |
|
2020-11-30 15:46:09 |
Launchpad Janitor |
linux (Ubuntu Focal): status |
Fix Committed |
Fix Released |
|
2020-11-30 15:46:09 |
Launchpad Janitor |
cve linked |
|
2020-14351 |
|
2020-11-30 15:46:09 |
Launchpad Janitor |
cve linked |
|
2020-4788 |
|
2020-12-01 17:43:22 |
Launchpad Janitor |
linux (Ubuntu Groovy): status |
Fix Committed |
Fix Released |
|