packages.ubuntu.com grossly violates design/brand guidelines

Bug #928259 reported by Prateek Karandikar
This bug report is a duplicate of:  Bug #818099: packages.u.com uses pre-2010 branding. Edit Remove
28
This bug affects 4 people
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
Ubuntu Brand Guidelines website
New
Undecided
Unassigned
ubuntu-branding
New
Undecided
Unassigned
ubuntu-website-content
Confirmed
Undecided
Steve Edwards

Bug Description

http://packages.ubuntu.com/ grossly violates design/brand guidelines as given here : http://design.ubuntu.com/ . As per http://design.ubuntu.com/web/ubuntu-and-canonical-web-universe , since packages.ubuntu.com is under the ubuntu.com namespace, it is a Tier 2 site, and the web design guidelines apply to it.

Example of violations :

* The colour used in the header does not adhere to the colour palette: http://design.ubuntu.com/assets/colour-palette .
* The logo used violates "Never change any of the colours in the logo" as explicitly stated here: http://design.ubuntu.com/assets/ubuntu-logo . http://design.ubuntu.com/web/ubuntu-and-canonical-web-universe reminds us , "Remember: the Ubuntu and Canonical logos must always be used according to the guidelines!"
* The font used in the header is not from the Ubuntu font family : http://design.ubuntu.com/assets/ubuntu-font-family .
* http://design.ubuntu.com/web/forms says that radio buttons must be stacked vertically, but they are stacked horizontally under the "Search package directories" heading. In general, guidelines from design.ubuntu.com/web/forms are ignored.
* Links aren't orange as they should be : http://design.ubuntu.com/web/links .
* The overall look and feel of the site is just very different from what one sees at http://design.ubuntu.com .

This gives the impression that Ubuntu is not serious about its own design guidelines.

(I am aware that the look and feel of packages.ubuntu.com is as per how things were a few years ago - however, that does not change any of the above.)

visibility: private → public
Changed in ubuntu-website-content:
status: New → Confirmed
Revision history for this message
Steve Edwards (steve-edwards) wrote :

Community run site, seemingly owned by Frank Lichtenheld (mailto:<email address hidden>).

Revision history for this message
Chris Johnston (cjohnston) wrote :

Steve, is the code available anywhere that you know of? Would make it much easier for people to update the theme if it is.

Revision history for this message
Inayaili de León (yaili) wrote :

This website is not maintained by Canonical. We'll get in touch with the maintainer to see what can be done.

Changed in ubuntu-website-content:
assignee: nobody → Steve Edwards (steve-edwards)
To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.