packages.ubuntu.com grossly violates design/brand guidelines
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ubuntu Brand Guidelines website |
New
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
ubuntu-branding |
New
|
Undecided
|
Unassigned | ||
ubuntu-website-content |
Confirmed
|
Undecided
|
Steve Edwards |
Bug Description
http://
Example of violations :
* The colour used in the header does not adhere to the colour palette: http://
* The logo used violates "Never change any of the colours in the logo" as explicitly stated here: http://
* The font used in the header is not from the Ubuntu font family : http://
* http://
* Links aren't orange as they should be : http://
* The overall look and feel of the site is just very different from what one sees at http://
This gives the impression that Ubuntu is not serious about its own design guidelines.
(I am aware that the look and feel of packages.ubuntu.com is as per how things were a few years ago - however, that does not change any of the above.)
visibility: | private → public |
Changed in ubuntu-website-content: | |
status: | New → Confirmed |
Community run site, seemingly owned by Frank Lichtenheld (mailto:<email address hidden>).