2012-02-26 05:27:14 |
Duncan McGreggor |
bug |
|
|
added bug |
2012-02-26 05:27:22 |
Duncan McGreggor |
ubuntu-accomplishments-system: assignee |
|
Duncan McGreggor (oubiwann) |
|
2012-02-26 05:27:28 |
Duncan McGreggor |
ubuntu-accomplishments-system: status |
New |
In Progress |
|
2012-02-26 06:20:31 |
Duncan McGreggor |
branch linked |
|
lp:~oubiwann/ubuntu-accomplishments-system/941255-unified-source-dir |
|
2012-02-26 06:20:59 |
Duncan McGreggor |
description |
This project installs the following into the Python libs dir:
* daemon
* trophyinfo
* trophyinfo_lib
The first one isn't such a good idea, since it's such a generic name... and someone else might have already used that name. Even if that's not the case, it's not good practice to install something in the Python lib space that isn't readily identifiable.
As for the second two, there's needless separation here: one is providing base classes for another.
All told , there's no reason to separate these three. Ideally, the code would be refactored to include them all in the same Python package. |
This project installs the following into the Python libs dir:
* daemon
* trophyinfo
* trophyinfo_lib
The first one isn't such a good idea, since it's such a generic name... and someone else might have already used that name. Even if that's not the case, it's not good practice to install something in the Python lib space that isn't readily identifiable.
As for the second two, there's needless separation here: one is providing base classes for another.
All told, there's no reason to separate these three. Ideally, the code would be refactored to include them all in the same Python package. |
|
2012-03-05 03:00:58 |
Duncan McGreggor |
description |
This project installs the following into the Python libs dir:
* daemon
* trophyinfo
* trophyinfo_lib
The first one isn't such a good idea, since it's such a generic name... and someone else might have already used that name. Even if that's not the case, it's not good practice to install something in the Python lib space that isn't readily identifiable.
As for the second two, there's needless separation here: one is providing base classes for another.
All told, there's no reason to separate these three. Ideally, the code would be refactored to include them all in the same Python package. |
This project installs the following into the Python libs dir:
* daemon
* trophyinfo
* trophyinfo_lib
The first one isn't such a good idea, since it's such a generic name... and someone else might have already used that name. Even if that's not the case, it's not good practice to install something in the Python lib space that isn't readily identifiable.
As for the second two, there's needless separation here: one is providing base classes for another.
All told, there's no reason to separate these three. Ideally, the code would be refactored to include them all in the same Python package.
Note that this also requires changes to the community contributions, and that work is being tracked in a separate ticket/branch: bug #946809. |
|
2012-03-05 03:01:29 |
Duncan McGreggor |
branch linked |
|
lp:~oubiwann/ubuntu-community-accomplishments/946809-module-changes |
|
2012-04-09 05:36:22 |
Jono Bacon |
ubuntu-accomplishments-system: status |
In Progress |
Invalid |
|