Validation: missing check for HostnameMap
Bug #1740396 reported by
Cédric Jeanneret deactivated
This bug affects 1 person
Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
tripleo |
Incomplete
|
Medium
|
Unassigned |
Bug Description
Dear Stackers,
When we use a static HostnameMap hash in an environment file, it would be great to have a validation that ensures we do not messed that hash.
In order to do so, it should ensure the uniqueness of tuples and ensure this kind of entries aren't present:
overcloud-
overcloud-
overcloud-
Preventing users to make typo and errors in that hash will prevent breaking the whole heat stack when we want to add new nodes (computes, for example).
Thank you!
Cheers,
C.
Changed in tripleo: | |
milestone: | none → rocky-1 |
importance: | Undecided → Medium |
status: | New → Triaged |
Changed in tripleo: | |
milestone: | rocky-1 → rocky-2 |
Changed in tripleo: | |
milestone: | rocky-2 → rocky-3 |
Changed in tripleo: | |
milestone: | rocky-3 → rocky-rc1 |
Changed in tripleo: | |
milestone: | rocky-rc1 → stein-1 |
Changed in tripleo: | |
milestone: | stein-1 → stein-2 |
Changed in tripleo: | |
milestone: | stein-2 → stein-3 |
Changed in tripleo: | |
milestone: | stein-3 → train-1 |
Changed in tripleo: | |
milestone: | train-1 → train-2 |
Changed in tripleo: | |
milestone: | train-2 → train-3 |
Changed in tripleo: | |
milestone: | train-3 → ussuri-1 |
Changed in tripleo: | |
milestone: | ussuri-1 → ussuri-2 |
Changed in tripleo: | |
milestone: | ussuri-2 → ussuri-3 |
Changed in tripleo: | |
milestone: | ussuri-3 → ussuri-rc3 |
Changed in tripleo: | |
status: | Triaged → Incomplete |
Changed in tripleo: | |
milestone: | ussuri-rc3 → victoria-1 |
Changed in tripleo: | |
milestone: | victoria-1 → victoria-3 |
To post a comment you must log in.
Should affect https:/ /github. com/openstack/ tripleo- validations/ tree/master/ validations tree
but on that matter, I'm clueless, as I really don't know what to do… validations seem to be dedicated workflows described in yaml - checking the hash would require some kind of script language I guess… Any hint would be good :).