Comment 4 for bug 330761

Revision history for this message
baxissimo (wbaxter) wrote : Re: [Bug 330761] Re: More options for how caching is done

On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 3:49 PM, Mark Hammond <email address hidden> wrote:

> in general, once a
> scan for the status of a tree is finished, the only handles we keep open
> are explicitly for detecting changes to the file-system so our cache can
> be invalidated and it is these handles we close on a device removal
> notification.

Hmm. Maybe I was too impatient to get disconnected. It didn't take
to tries for me to jump to the conclusion that "this is the same old
problem as tortoise svn". And with tsvn waiting doesn't seem to help.