Normalizing how type-instance and supertype-subtype associations are kept and presented

Bug #373163 reported by Rani Pinchuk on 2009-05-07
6
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone
TopiEngine
Undecided
Unassigned

Bug Description

In TopiEngine we have dedicated database tables for keeping the type-instance and supertype-subtype associations.

For type-instance the table is type_instance. For supertype-subtype the table is super_sub.

However, both associations are created currently also as usual associations, but in different way - which is confusing.

It should be checked if we should have this redundancy.

It should be checked also if we should return type-instance associations when calling methods like getAssociations.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  Edit
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers