Normalizing how type-instance and supertype-subtype associations are kept and presented

Bug #373163 reported by Rani Pinchuk
This bug affects 1 person
Affects Status Importance Assigned to Milestone

Bug Description

In TopiEngine we have dedicated database tables for keeping the type-instance and supertype-subtype associations.

For type-instance the table is type_instance. For supertype-subtype the table is super_sub.

However, both associations are created currently also as usual associations, but in different way - which is confusing.

It should be checked if we should have this redundancy.

It should be checked also if we should return type-instance associations when calling methods like getAssociations.

To post a comment you must log in.
This report contains Public information  
Everyone can see this information.

Other bug subscribers

Remote bug watches

Bug watches keep track of this bug in other bug trackers.