confusing name of field in sql c connector
Bug #1082383 reported by
bigbes
This bug affects 1 person
| Affects | Status | Importance | Assigned to | Milestone | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| tarantool |
Confirmed
|
Wishlist
|
bigbes | ||
Bug Description
In our sql notation in Set operation there's confusing similarity of naming fields and keys:
update t0 set k2='ice cream' where k0=2
update t0 set k1=splice(k1,1,0,' love') where k0=2
Maybe it's better to rename field to `fN`or any word or letter in the begging (but ends strictly with number of field)?
Revision history for this message
| Kostja Osipov (kostja) wrote | #1 |
| Changed in tarantool: | |
| milestone: | none → 1.5.1 |
| assignee: | Dmitry Simonenko (pmwkaa) → bigbes (bigbes) |
| status: | New → Confirmed |
| Changed in tarantool: | |
| milestone: | 1.5.1 → 1.5.2 |
To post a comment you must log in.
We should allow any alphanumeric sequence in any identifier. It's only important that they end with a number.